Lachish (LHIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.23x

Lachish (LHIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA10.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA45.37 Million) in one year. See Lachish free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.23x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA10.66 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA45.37 Million
ILA

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Lachish Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Lachish across 17 annual periods. Also explore Lachish (LHIS) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lachish (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lachish. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Lachish worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.48x ILA21.86 Million ILA45.37 Million ▲ +97.0%
2024 0.24x ILA11.68 Million ILA47.76 Million ▲ +53.4%
2023 0.16x ILA9.51 Million ILA59.65 Million ▲ +251.6%
2022 0.05x ILA2.67 Million ILA58.97 Million ▼ -69.9%
2021 0.15x ILA7.50 Million ILA49.74 Million ▼ -34.7%
2020 0.23x ILA9.88 Million ILA42.78 Million ▲ +103.3%
2019 0.11x ILA4.49 Million ILA39.56 Million ▲ +26.8%
2018 0.09x ILA3.86 Million ILA43.16 Million ▲ +19.7%
2017 0.07x ILA3.01 Million ILA40.20 Million ▲ +10.0%
2016 0.07x ILA2.01 Million ILA29.52 Million ▼ -55.3%
2015 0.15x ILA5.43 Million ILA35.65 Million ▲ +309.6%
2014 0.04x ILA1.75 Million ILA47.18 Million ▼ -80.2%
2013 0.19x ILA8.29 Million ILA44.10 Million ▼ -10.5%
2012 0.21x ILA9.60 Million ILA45.70 Million ▲ +127.4%
2010 0.09x ILA3.86 Million ILA41.82 Million ▼ -62.1%
2009 0.24x ILA9.66 Million ILA39.70 Million ▲ +167.1%
2008 0.09x ILA5.90 Million ILA64.78 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.