Robogroup (ROBO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of December 2025:
-0.09x
Robogroup (ROBO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA-1.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA12.54 Million) in one year. Explore ROBO long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
-0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
ILA-1.16 Million
ILA
Total Liabilities
ILA12.54 Million
ILA
Data as of
Dec 2025
Most recent filing
Robogroup Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Robogroup across 29 annual periods. Also explore Robogroup asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Robogroup (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Robogroup. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Robogroup worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (ILA) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | ILA-227.32K | ILA12.54 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2024 | -0.25x | ILA-3.03 Million | ILA12.31 Million | ▼ -401.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | ILA-597.00K | ILA12.15 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | ILA-3.35 Million | ILA12.24 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2021 | -0.31x | ILA-5.02 Million | ILA16.11 Million | ▼ -633.8% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | ILA817.00K | ILA13.99 Million | ▲ +202.3% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | ILA178.00K | ILA9.21 Million | ▲ +104.0% |
| 2018 | -0.49x | ILA-2.99 Million | ILA6.14 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2017 | -0.30x | ILA-2.27 Million | ILA7.64 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2016 | -0.43x | ILA-2.14 Million | ILA4.97 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | ILA-1.68 Million | ILA5.99 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | ILA-1.03 Million | ILA3.52 Million | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | ILA-614.00K | ILA4.18 Million | ▼ -150.6% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | ILA6.80 Million | ILA23.40 Million | ▲ +180.5% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | ILA2.79 Million | ILA26.94 Million | ▲ +184.0% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | ILA-1.40 Million | ILA11.33 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | ILA-2.11 Million | ILA12.24 Million | ▼ -171.1% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | ILA2.88 Million | ILA11.87 Million | ▲ +402.5% |
| 2001 | -0.08x | ILA-958.00K | ILA11.95 Million | ▼ -152.5% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | ILA2.09 Million | ILA13.69 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | ILA1.63 Million | ILA10.39 Million | ▲ +129.3% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | ILA1.00 Million | ILA14.60 Million | ▲ +252.7% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | ILA200.00K | ILA10.30 Million | ▲ +155.7% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | ILA-300.00K | ILA8.60 Million | ▲ +51.9% |
| 1995 | -0.07x | ILA-500.00K | ILA6.90 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 1994 | -0.15x | ILA-1.10 Million | ILA7.50 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1993 | -0.40x | ILA-1.20 Million | ILA3.00 Million | ▼ -235.0% |
| 1992 | 0.30x | ILA800.00K | ILA2.70 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 1991 | 0.58x | ILA1.10 Million | ILA1.90 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.