Shapir Engineering Industry (SPEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.02x

Shapir Engineering Industry (SPEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA-209.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA12.93 Billion) in one year. See Shapir Engineering Industry financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA-209.00 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA12.93 Billion
ILA

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Shapir Engineering Industry Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Shapir Engineering Industry across 13 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Shapir Engineering Industry (SPEN) cash conversion ratio.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shapir Engineering Industry (2012–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shapir Engineering Industry. Check how high is Shapir Engineering Industry's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.02x ILA183.00 Million ILA11.66 Billion ▼ -68.7%
2023 0.05x ILA559.00 Million ILA11.16 Billion ▲ +212.0%
2022 -0.04x ILA-482.00 Million ILA10.78 Billion ▼ -170.8%
2021 0.06x ILA523.90 Million ILA8.29 Billion ▼ -30.0%
2020 0.09x ILA508.34 Million ILA5.64 Billion ▲ +155.1%
2019 0.04x ILA189.77 Million ILA5.37 Billion ▲ +40.7%
2018 0.03x ILA131.56 Million ILA5.24 Billion ▼ -73.2%
2017 0.09x ILA463.48 Million ILA4.94 Billion ▲ +373.1%
2016 0.02x ILA81.03 Million ILA4.09 Billion ▼ -50.0%
2015 0.04x ILA109.60 Million ILA2.77 Billion ▲ +4612.3%
2014 0.00x ILA2.16 Million ILA2.57 Billion ▼ -97.2%
2013 0.03x ILA91.27 Million ILA2.99 Billion ▼ -60.3%
2012 0.08x ILA213.43 Million ILA2.78 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.