TGI Infrastructures Ltd (TGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.14x

TGI Infrastructures Ltd (TGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ILA13.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (ILA93.18 Million) in one year. See TGI Infrastructures Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.14x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

ILA13.35 Million
ILA

Total Liabilities

ILA93.18 Million
ILA

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

TGI Infrastructures Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for TGI Infrastructures Ltd across 14 annual periods. Also explore TGI Infrastructures Ltd (TGI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TGI Infrastructures Ltd (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TGI Infrastructures Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGI stock market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (ILA) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.39x ILA36.61 Million ILA93.18 Million ▲ +78.3%
2024 0.22x ILA22.27 Million ILA101.07 Million ▼ -30.8%
2023 0.32x ILA14.01 Million ILA43.95 Million ▲ +3235.8%
2022 0.01x ILA2.17 Million ILA226.72 Million ▲ +122.2%
2021 -0.04x ILA-2.95 Million ILA68.55 Million ▼ -152.6%
2020 0.08x ILA4.63 Million ILA56.63 Million ▼ -23.9%
2019 0.11x ILA7.34 Million ILA68.28 Million ▲ +148.2%
2018 -0.22x ILA-16.06 Million ILA72.03 Million ▼ -503.5%
2017 0.06x ILA5.46 Million ILA98.81 Million ▲ +304.4%
2016 -0.03x ILA-3.65 Million ILA135.03 Million ▼ -128.3%
2015 0.10x ILA13.38 Million ILA140.22 Million ▲ +127.4%
2014 0.04x ILA6.22 Million ILA148.20 Million ▼ -52.9%
2013 0.09x ILA13.13 Million ILA147.41 Million ▲ +5.0%
2012 0.08x ILA13.52 Million ILA159.42 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.