ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (ACX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (ACX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$208.70 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.39x | CA$90.18 Million | CA$231.30 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$69.98 Million | CA$224.26 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | CA$39.88 Million | CA$200.09 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 2021 | -0.11x | CA$-3.50 Million | CA$32.92 Million | ▼ -316.9% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$1.19 Million | CA$24.31 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$4.79 Million | CA$38.21 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | CA$3.73 Million | CA$32.63 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$2.95 Million | CA$20.24 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$4.14 Million | CA$45.24 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | CA$25.93 Million | CA$59.00 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$36.94 Million | CA$102.17 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | CA$14.03 Million | CA$78.76 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$60.81 Million | CA$86.15 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | CA$28.14 Million | CA$95.82 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | CA$29.32 Million | CA$68.61 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$18.56 Million | CA$76.11 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$36.14 Million | CA$92.01 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | CA$39.73 Million | CA$51.78 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2006 | 0.81x | CA$39.93 Million | CA$49.00 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2005 | 0.50x | CA$21.61 Million | CA$43.29 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.66x | CA$8.81 Million | CA$13.26 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | CA$7.04 Million | CA$16.49 Million | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | CA$5.64 Million | CA$8.44 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2001 | 0.76x | CA$6.60 Million | CA$8.70 Million | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | 0.48x | CA$4.23 Million | CA$8.87 Million | ▲ +472.4% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | CA$200.00K | CA$2.40 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 1997 | -0.16x | CA$-300.00K | CA$1.90 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 1996 | 1.07x | CA$1.50 Million | CA$1.40 Million | — |