ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (ACX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (ACX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$208.70 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ACX operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ACT Energy Technologies Ltd.. Check how high is ACT Energy Technologies Ltd.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.39x | CA$90.18 Million | CA$231.30 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$69.98 Million | CA$224.26 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | CA$39.88 Million | CA$200.09 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 2021 | -0.11x | CA$-3.50 Million | CA$32.92 Million | ▼ -316.9% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$1.19 Million | CA$24.31 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$4.79 Million | CA$38.21 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | CA$3.73 Million | CA$32.63 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$2.95 Million | CA$20.24 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$4.14 Million | CA$45.24 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | CA$25.93 Million | CA$59.00 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$36.94 Million | CA$102.17 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | CA$14.03 Million | CA$78.76 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$60.81 Million | CA$86.15 Million | ▲ +140.4% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | CA$28.14 Million | CA$95.82 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2010 | 0.43x | CA$29.32 Million | CA$68.61 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$18.56 Million | CA$76.11 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | CA$36.14 Million | CA$92.01 Million | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | CA$39.73 Million | CA$51.78 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2006 | 0.81x | CA$39.93 Million | CA$49.00 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2005 | 0.50x | CA$21.61 Million | CA$43.29 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2004 | 0.66x | CA$8.81 Million | CA$13.26 Million | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | CA$7.04 Million | CA$16.49 Million | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | CA$5.64 Million | CA$8.44 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2001 | 0.76x | CA$6.60 Million | CA$8.70 Million | ▲ +59.0% |
| 2000 | 0.48x | CA$4.23 Million | CA$8.87 Million | ▲ +472.4% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | CA$200.00K | CA$2.40 Million | ▲ +152.8% |
| 1997 | -0.16x | CA$-300.00K | CA$1.90 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 1996 | 1.07x | CA$1.50 Million | CA$1.40 Million | — |