Algoma Central Corporation (ALC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Algoma Central Corporation (ALC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$43.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$762.36 Million) in one year. See Algoma Central Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Algoma Central Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Algoma Central Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore ALC net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Algoma Central Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Algoma Central Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ALC stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$135.37 Million | CA$762.36 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | CA$155.39 Million | CA$624.11 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | CA$124.21 Million | CA$565.85 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | CA$133.13 Million | CA$639.67 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | CA$162.38 Million | CA$559.80 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | CA$157.06 Million | CA$662.48 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | CA$137.76 Million | CA$486.96 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$80.11 Million | CA$409.34 Million | ▲ +37.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$62.77 Million | CA$439.83 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | CA$90.12 Million | CA$394.46 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$57.75 Million | CA$370.19 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CA$104.87 Million | CA$366.96 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.28x | CA$105.24 Million | CA$371.27 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | CA$84.22 Million | CA$384.73 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | CA$103.84 Million | CA$405.68 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | CA$74.01 Million | CA$288.93 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$60.34 Million | CA$255.57 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | CA$89.97 Million | CA$266.02 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2007 | 0.52x | CA$80.59 Million | CA$154.46 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$82.47 Million | CA$170.72 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$69.68 Million | CA$159.16 Million | ▲ +136.6% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$28.25 Million | CA$152.66 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | CA$25.80 Million | CA$136.46 Million | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$37.63 Million | CA$152.27 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2001 | 0.33x | CA$54.67 Million | CA$166.24 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | CA$42.23 Million | CA$172.26 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$38.60 Million | CA$195.90 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 1998 | 0.18x | CA$31.20 Million | CA$170.30 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1997 | 0.22x | CA$33.10 Million | CA$152.30 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 1996 | 0.36x | CA$32.60 Million | CA$91.70 Million | — |