Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-351.10K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.63 Million) in one year. See Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Almaden Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Almaden Minerals Ltd across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Almaden Minerals Ltd (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Almaden Minerals Ltd. Check Almaden Minerals Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-902.44K | CA$8.83 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2023 | -0.26x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$5.71 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$8.23 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$7.05 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2020 | -0.24x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$5.27 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$5.48 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2018 | -0.75x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2017 | -1.29x | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2015 | -1.35x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2014 | -1.30x | CA$-3.09 Million | CA$2.38 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2013 | -1.48x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2012 | -2.57x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2011 | -6.32x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$565.10K | ▼ -232.5% |
| 2010 | -1.90x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$649.48K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2009 | -1.94x | CA$-946.19K | CA$488.58K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2008 | -3.76x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$335.27K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | -3.15x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$707.49K | ▼ -217.1% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | CA$-743.84K | CA$748.90K | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2005 | -2.78x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$566.20K | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$458.79K | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2003 | -1.87x | CA$-911.77K | CA$487.29K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-855.49K | CA$454.27K | ▼ -190.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-296.76K | CA$458.19K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2000 | -3.84x | CA$-288.22K | CA$75.06K | — |