Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-351.10K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.63 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Almaden Minerals Ltd generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Almaden Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Almaden Minerals Ltd across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Almaden Minerals Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Almaden Minerals Ltd (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Almaden Minerals Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AMM market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-902.44K | CA$8.83 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2023 | -0.26x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$5.71 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$8.23 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$7.05 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2020 | -0.24x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$5.27 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$5.48 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2018 | -0.75x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2017 | -1.29x | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2015 | -1.35x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2014 | -1.30x | CA$-3.09 Million | CA$2.38 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2013 | -1.48x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2012 | -2.57x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2011 | -6.32x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$565.10K | ▼ -232.5% |
| 2010 | -1.90x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$649.48K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2009 | -1.94x | CA$-946.19K | CA$488.58K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2008 | -3.76x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$335.27K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | -3.15x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$707.49K | ▼ -217.1% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | CA$-743.84K | CA$748.90K | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2005 | -2.78x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$566.20K | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$458.79K | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2003 | -1.87x | CA$-911.77K | CA$487.29K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-855.49K | CA$454.27K | ▼ -190.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-296.76K | CA$458.19K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2000 | -3.84x | CA$-288.22K | CA$75.06K | — |