Almaden Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Almaden Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Almaden Minerals Ltd (AMM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-351.10K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.63 Million) in one year. Check AMM cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Almaden Minerals Ltd (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Almaden Minerals Ltd from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Almaden Minerals Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check Almaden Minerals Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Almaden Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
Almaden Minerals Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Almaden Minerals Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AMM cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-902.44K | CA$8.83 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2023 | -0.26x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$5.71 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2022 | -0.20x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$8.23 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | -0.23x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$7.05 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2020 | -0.24x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$5.27 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$5.48 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2018 | -0.75x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$2.56 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2017 | -1.29x | CA$-2.67 Million | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2015 | -1.35x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$2.23 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2014 | -1.30x | CA$-3.09 Million | CA$2.38 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2013 | -1.48x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +42.2% |
| 2012 | -2.57x | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2011 | -6.32x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$565.10K | ▼ -232.5% |
| 2010 | -1.90x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$649.48K | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2009 | -1.94x | CA$-946.19K | CA$488.58K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2008 | -3.76x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$335.27K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | -3.15x | CA$-2.23 Million | CA$707.49K | ▼ -217.1% |
| 2006 | -0.99x | CA$-743.84K | CA$748.90K | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2005 | -2.78x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$566.20K | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$458.79K | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2003 | -1.87x | CA$-911.77K | CA$487.29K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2002 | -1.88x | CA$-855.49K | CA$454.27K | ▼ -190.8% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-296.76K | CA$458.19K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2000 | -3.84x | CA$-288.22K | CA$75.06K | — |