Aecon Group Inc. (ARE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Aecon Group Inc. (ARE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$56.99 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.82 Billion) in one year. Explore Aecon Group Inc. long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Aecon Group Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Aecon Group Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore ARE total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Aecon Group Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Aecon Group Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ARE market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.01x | CA$28.65 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | CA$64.93 Million | CA$2.13 Billion | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | CA$-109.68 Million | CA$2.61 Billion | ▼ -252.3% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | CA$-28.27 Million | CA$2.37 Billion | ▼ -110.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$274.95 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$203.35 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$368.88 Million | CA$2.11 Billion | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$203.66 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▲ +289.9% |
| 2016 | 0.03x | CA$37.26 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$70.77 Million | CA$1.16 Billion | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$113.97 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | CA$141.74 Million | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +207.6% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | CA$51.73 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | CA$197.48 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▲ +317.2% |
| 2010 | -0.06x | CA$-98.25 Million | CA$1.61 Billion | ▼ -1125.2% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | CA$-6.09 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$143.91 Million | CA$804.15 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | CA$97.48 Million | CA$684.31 Million | ▲ +4975.7% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$562.68 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | CA$-27.91 Million | CA$398.09 Million | ▼ -207.8% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | CA$-8.03 Million | CA$352.37 Million | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-27.45 Million | CA$366.39 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | CA$-36.65 Million | CA$384.17 Million | ▼ -157.1% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | CA$81.85 Million | CA$489.48 Million | ▲ +169.3% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$27.24 Million | CA$438.67 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | CA$17.90 Million | CA$388.00 Million | ▲ +148.9% |
| 1998 | -0.09x | CA$-7.10 Million | CA$75.30 Million | ▼ -134.7% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | CA$18.50 Million | CA$68.00 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | CA$13.00 Million | CA$75.90 Million | — |