Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (BDGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (BDGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$106.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$478.47 Million) in one year. See Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (BDGI) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.29x | CA$127.35 Million | CA$437.48 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | CA$121.36 Million | CA$410.47 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$59.10 Million | CA$331.60 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | CA$49.01 Million | CA$267.02 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2020 | 0.43x | CA$103.60 Million | CA$241.00 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | CA$80.28 Million | CA$254.08 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | CA$95.13 Million | CA$174.29 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$64.85 Million | CA$145.41 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | CA$54.83 Million | CA$135.08 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | CA$68.01 Million | CA$132.92 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | CA$76.17 Million | CA$204.65 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | CA$57.94 Million | CA$165.63 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | CA$46.29 Million | CA$89.88 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$32.92 Million | CA$98.34 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$26.10 Million | CA$76.06 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | CA$32.11 Million | CA$62.75 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2008 | 0.44x | CA$32.88 Million | CA$74.73 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | CA$24.81 Million | CA$53.18 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2006 | 0.77x | CA$23.53 Million | CA$30.62 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | CA$22.31 Million | CA$20.26 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | CA$12.69 Million | CA$21.13 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | CA$5.59 Million | CA$25.35 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2001 | 0.54x | CA$13.38 Million | CA$24.88 Million | ▲ +183.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$8.00 Million | CA$42.08 Million | ▲ +700.8% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$41.10 Million | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | CA$13.60 Million | CA$37.30 Million | ▲ +158.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$3.70 Million | CA$26.20 Million | — |