Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (BDGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (BDGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$106.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$478.47 Million) in one year. See BDGI FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BDGI cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. Check Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.29x | CA$127.35 Million | CA$437.48 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | CA$121.36 Million | CA$410.47 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$59.10 Million | CA$331.60 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | CA$49.01 Million | CA$267.02 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2020 | 0.43x | CA$103.60 Million | CA$241.00 Million | ▲ +36.1% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | CA$80.28 Million | CA$254.08 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2018 | 0.55x | CA$95.13 Million | CA$174.29 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$64.85 Million | CA$145.41 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | CA$54.83 Million | CA$135.08 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | CA$68.01 Million | CA$132.92 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | CA$76.17 Million | CA$204.65 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | CA$57.94 Million | CA$165.63 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | CA$46.29 Million | CA$89.88 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$32.92 Million | CA$98.34 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.34x | CA$26.10 Million | CA$76.06 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | CA$32.11 Million | CA$62.75 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2008 | 0.44x | CA$32.88 Million | CA$74.73 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | CA$24.81 Million | CA$53.18 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2006 | 0.77x | CA$23.53 Million | CA$30.62 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | CA$22.31 Million | CA$20.26 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2003 | 0.60x | CA$12.69 Million | CA$21.13 Million | ▲ +172.2% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | CA$5.59 Million | CA$25.35 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2001 | 0.54x | CA$13.38 Million | CA$24.88 Million | ▲ +183.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$8.00 Million | CA$42.08 Million | ▲ +700.8% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$41.10 Million | ▼ -108.7% |
| 1998 | 0.36x | CA$13.60 Million | CA$37.30 Million | ▲ +158.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$3.70 Million | CA$26.20 Million | — |