Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$61.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.11 Billion) in one year. Explore Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$259.83 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$241.20 Million | CA$3.79 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$199.80 Million | CA$3.82 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$160.90 Million | CA$3.60 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | CA$161.86 Million | CA$3.41 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | CA$141.08 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$160.74 Million | CA$3.16 Billion | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$107.30 Million | CA$2.98 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | CA$102.06 Million | CA$2.89 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$133.69 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$172.22 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$173.57 Million | CA$2.61 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$170.11 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | CA$149.24 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$134.91 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CA$139.30 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | CA$141.86 Million | CA$2.42 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | CA$146.44 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$127.70 Million | CA$2.05 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$95.81 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$81.20 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.62 Million | CA$1.45 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$70.51 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$76.19 Million | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$60.56 Million | CA$1.20 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$63.69 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$57.90 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$27.10 Million | CA$910.60 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$712.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | CA$11.90 Million | CA$344.40 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | CA$5.50 Million | CA$99.30 Million | ▲ +145.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | CA$2.50 Million | CA$111.00 Million | — |