Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$58.43 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.98 Billion) in one year. See Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust. Check BEI-UN cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$259.83 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$241.20 Million | CA$3.79 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$199.80 Million | CA$3.82 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$160.90 Million | CA$3.60 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | CA$161.86 Million | CA$3.41 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | CA$141.08 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$160.74 Million | CA$3.16 Billion | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$107.30 Million | CA$2.98 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | CA$102.06 Million | CA$2.89 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$133.69 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$172.22 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$173.57 Million | CA$2.61 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$170.11 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | CA$149.24 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$134.91 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CA$139.30 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | CA$141.86 Million | CA$2.42 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | CA$146.44 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$127.70 Million | CA$2.05 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$95.81 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$81.20 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.62 Million | CA$1.45 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$70.51 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$76.19 Million | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$60.56 Million | CA$1.20 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$63.69 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$57.90 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$27.10 Million | CA$910.60 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$712.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | CA$11.90 Million | CA$344.40 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | CA$5.50 Million | CA$99.30 Million | ▲ +145.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | CA$2.50 Million | CA$111.00 Million | — |