Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (BEI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$61.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.11 Billion) in one year. See BEI-UN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BEI-UN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$259.83 Million | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | CA$241.20 Million | CA$3.79 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$199.80 Million | CA$3.82 Billion | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$160.90 Million | CA$3.60 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | CA$161.86 Million | CA$3.41 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | CA$141.08 Million | CA$3.23 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | CA$160.74 Million | CA$3.16 Billion | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$107.30 Million | CA$2.98 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | CA$102.06 Million | CA$2.89 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$133.69 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$172.22 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$173.57 Million | CA$2.61 Billion | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$170.11 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | CA$149.24 Million | CA$2.63 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$134.91 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CA$139.30 Million | CA$2.44 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | CA$141.86 Million | CA$2.42 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | CA$146.44 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$127.70 Million | CA$2.05 Billion | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$95.81 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$81.20 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$82.62 Million | CA$1.45 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$70.51 Million | CA$1.49 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$76.19 Million | CA$1.41 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$60.56 Million | CA$1.20 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$63.69 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | CA$57.90 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$27.10 Million | CA$910.60 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$712.60 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | CA$11.90 Million | CA$344.40 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | CA$5.50 Million | CA$99.30 Million | ▲ +145.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | CA$2.50 Million | CA$111.00 Million | — |