Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$345.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$63.61 Billion) in one year. See Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P across 27 annual periods. Also explore Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BEP-UN market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | CA$1.52 Billion | CA$63.61 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | CA$1.21 Billion | CA$58.35 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | CA$1.90 Billion | CA$46.15 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$37.83 Billion | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | CA$727.54 Million | CA$31.87 Billion | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$1.36 Billion | CA$27.95 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$1.24 Billion | CA$17.56 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$1.05 Billion | CA$16.90 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$961.37 Million | CA$16.62 Billion | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | CA$624.40 Million | CA$15.06 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$674.18 Million | CA$10.74 Billion | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | CA$667.49 Million | CA$10.97 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | CA$723.45 Million | CA$9.44 Billion | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | CA$399.58 Million | CA$9.12 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | CA$339.11 Million | CA$8.51 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | CA$132.14 Million | CA$3.10 Billion | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2009 | -0.08x | CA$-204.38 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -159.8% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$87.85 Million | CA$634.77 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$64.54 Million | CA$767.90 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$74.50 Million | CA$650.10 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | CA$51.54 Million | CA$614.62 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | CA$80.95 Million | CA$527.28 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | CA$36.29 Million | CA$426.53 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | CA$30.20 Million | CA$332.62 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$15.81 Million | CA$124.34 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | CA$21.65 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +1385.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$1.45 Million | CA$74.64 Million | — |