Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$345.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$63.61 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. Check BEP-UN cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | CA$1.52 Billion | CA$63.61 Billion | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | CA$1.21 Billion | CA$58.35 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | CA$1.90 Billion | CA$46.15 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$37.83 Billion | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | CA$727.54 Million | CA$31.87 Billion | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$1.36 Billion | CA$27.95 Billion | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$1.24 Billion | CA$17.56 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$1.05 Billion | CA$16.90 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$961.37 Million | CA$16.62 Billion | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | CA$624.40 Million | CA$15.06 Billion | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$674.18 Million | CA$10.74 Billion | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | CA$667.49 Million | CA$10.97 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | CA$723.45 Million | CA$9.44 Billion | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | CA$399.58 Million | CA$9.12 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | CA$339.11 Million | CA$8.51 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | CA$132.14 Million | CA$3.10 Billion | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2009 | -0.08x | CA$-204.38 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -159.8% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$87.85 Million | CA$634.77 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$64.54 Million | CA$767.90 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$74.50 Million | CA$650.10 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | CA$51.54 Million | CA$614.62 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2004 | 0.15x | CA$80.95 Million | CA$527.28 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | CA$36.29 Million | CA$426.53 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | CA$30.20 Million | CA$332.62 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$15.81 Million | CA$124.34 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | CA$21.65 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +1385.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$1.45 Million | CA$74.64 Million | — |