Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$93.48 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.30 Billion) in one year. See BIR free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Birchcliff Energy Ltd. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Birchcliff Energy Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Birchcliff Energy Ltd. market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.31x | CA$406.00 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +113.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | CA$200.31 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$320.53 Million | CA$1.03 Billion | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2022 | 1.12x | CA$925.27 Million | CA$826.41 Million | ▲ +126.5% |
| 2021 | 0.49x | CA$515.37 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +234.9% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$188.18 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | CA$326.08 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | CA$323.48 Million | CA$988.03 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2017 | 0.31x | CA$285.29 Million | CA$930.96 Million | ▲ +109.7% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | CA$139.72 Million | CA$956.05 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CA$147.86 Million | CA$926.94 Million | ▼ -53.4% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | CA$308.88 Million | CA$902.22 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$169.41 Million | CA$770.87 Million | ▲ +39.0% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | CA$107.63 Million | CA$680.82 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | CA$142.90 Million | CA$568.89 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | CA$95.77 Million | CA$439.42 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | CA$56.82 Million | CA$323.09 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2008 | 0.43x | CA$132.44 Million | CA$307.45 Million | ▲ +150.1% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | CA$54.30 Million | CA$315.21 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | CA$28.87 Million | CA$115.86 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2005 | 0.82x | CA$60.00 Million | CA$72.73 Million | ▲ +262.0% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | CA$-656.39K | CA$1.29 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2003 | -3.85x | CA$-364.80K | CA$94.71K | ▼ -1157.5% |
| 2002 | -0.31x | CA$-587.11K | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 2001 | -2.62x | CA$-4.06 Million | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -468.3% |
| 2000 | 0.71x | CA$310.76K | CA$436.77K | — |