Boralex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Boralex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Boralex Inc (BLX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$37.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.68 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Boralex Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Boralex Inc (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Boralex Inc from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Boralex Inc across 26 annual periods. Check BLX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Boralex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Boralex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Boralex Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Boralex Inc (BLX) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.04x | CA$215.00 Million | CA$5.58 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | CA$496.00 Million | CA$4.55 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | CA$513.00 Million | CA$4.51 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | CA$345.00 Million | CA$4.54 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$362.00 Million | CA$4.32 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$294.00 Million | CA$3.68 Billion | ▲ +52.0% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | CA$202.00 Million | CA$3.85 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | CA$145.00 Million | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$148.00 Million | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$114.00 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$51.66 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$59.27 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | CA$47.40 Million | CA$887.50 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$66.13 Million | CA$847.98 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$45.97 Million | CA$858.57 Million | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | CA$60.79 Million | CA$316.71 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2008 | 0.21x | CA$54.27 Million | CA$259.61 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$35.06 Million | CA$229.35 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | CA$13.80 Million | CA$294.05 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CA$19.31 Million | CA$263.27 Million | ▼ -45.7% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | CA$16.51 Million | CA$122.14 Million | ▲ +194.0% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-12.52 Million | CA$87.08 Million | ▼ -227.8% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CA$9.62 Million | CA$85.51 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | CA$15.22 Million | CA$224.49 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | CA$17.29 Million | CA$187.56 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | CA$14.76 Million | CA$183.92 Million | — |