Bengal Energy Ltd (BNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bengal Energy Ltd (BNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-89.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.88 Million) in one year. See BNG free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bengal Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bengal Energy Ltd across 29 annual periods. Also explore Bengal Energy Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bengal Energy Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bengal Energy Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Bengal Energy Ltd (BNG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | CA$-392.00K | CA$6.60 Million | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | CA$-273.00K | CA$6.66 Million | ▼ -115.9% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | CA$2.11 Million | CA$8.16 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | CA$835.00K | CA$6.66 Million | ▲ +129.8% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | CA$301.00K | CA$5.52 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$1.13 Million | CA$22.63 Million | ▼ -61.1% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$21.03 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$3.63 Million | CA$20.82 Million | ▼ -24.4% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | CA$4.51 Million | CA$19.60 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$5.40 Million | CA$21.96 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | CA$6.92 Million | CA$20.73 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2014 | 0.55x | CA$7.59 Million | CA$13.84 Million | ▲ +754.1% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-703.00K | CA$8.38 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2012 | -0.42x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$2.71 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2011 | -0.85x | CA$-2.39 Million | CA$2.81 Million | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2010 | -2.17x | CA$-1.65 Million | CA$759.00K | ▼ -298.5% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.62 Million | ▲ +463.7% |
| 2008 | -0.30x | CA$-486.00K | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -145.2% |
| 2007 | 0.67x | CA$734.00K | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2006 | -0.44x | CA$-672.84K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 2005 | -1.18x | CA$-631.35K | CA$536.88K | ▼ -71.5% |
| 2004 | -0.69x | CA$-339.93K | CA$495.75K | ▼ -127.2% |
| 2003 | -0.30x | CA$-145.77K | CA$483.03K | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2002 | -0.59x | CA$-360.26K | CA$608.28K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2001 | -1.42x | CA$-546.76K | CA$385.98K | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2000 | -11.00x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$100.00K | ▼ -175.0% |
| 1999 | -4.00x | CA$-800.00K | CA$200.00K | ▼ -730.8% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$2.70 Million | ▼ -148.1% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | CA$200.00K | CA$200.00K | — |