Celestica Inc. (CLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$356.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.16 Billion) in one year. See Celestica Inc. (CLS) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Celestica Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Celestica Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore CLS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Celestica Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Celestica Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Celestica Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | CA$671.04 Million | CA$4.99 Billion | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | CA$473.90 Million | CA$4.09 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | CA$429.70 Million | CA$4.12 Billion | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | CA$297.90 Million | CA$3.95 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$226.80 Million | CA$3.20 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CA$239.60 Million | CA$2.26 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | CA$345.00 Million | CA$2.20 Billion | ▲ +1037.3% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | CA$33.10 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -82.7% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | CA$127.00 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$173.30 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | CA$196.30 Million | CA$1.52 Billion | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$241.50 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$149.40 Million | CA$1.24 Billion | ▼ -48.1% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | CA$312.40 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▲ +78.6% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | CA$196.30 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$150.90 Million | CA$1.68 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2009 | 0.18x | CA$293.50 Million | CA$1.63 Billion | ▲ +109.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$208.20 Million | CA$2.42 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$351.40 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▲ +887.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$39.20 Million | CA$2.59 Billion | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | CA$218.30 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▲ +245.4% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | CA$-139.20 Million | CA$2.45 Billion | ▼ -151.7% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-37.60 Million | CA$1.67 Billion | ▼ -103.7% |
| 2002 | 0.61x | CA$982.80 Million | CA$1.60 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2001 | 0.68x | CA$1.29 Billion | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +2083.0% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | CA$-85.13 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▲ +63.6% |
| 1999 | -0.09x | CA$-94.40 Million | CA$997.50 Million | ▼ -190.1% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$81.60 Million | CA$777.10 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | CA$33.50 Million | CA$983.20 Million | — |