Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$48.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$906.82 Million) in one year. Explore CNE strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canacol Energy Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canacol Energy Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canacol Energy Ltd. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canacol Energy Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$168.04 Million | CA$894.64 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | CA$95.34 Million | CA$881.75 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | CA$185.43 Million | CA$722.91 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$123.81 Million | CA$658.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$152.32 Million | CA$542.42 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$108.35 Million | CA$511.32 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$94.01 Million | CA$499.57 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$65.35 Million | CA$457.30 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$73.58 Million | CA$411.12 Million | ▲ +927.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$6.36 Million | CA$365.06 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$64.44 Million | CA$328.11 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$77.94 Million | CA$356.30 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | CA$29.55 Million | CA$229.84 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | CA$36.74 Million | CA$115.73 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$47.80 Million | CA$115.53 Million | ▲ +8620.9% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | CA$-219.00K | CA$45.11 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | CA$-2.28 Million | CA$41.26 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | CA$-6.64 Million | CA$76.00 Million | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2006 | -2.37x | CA$-4.95 Million | CA$2.09 Million | ▼ -661.5% |
| 2005 | -0.31x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$3.54 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2003 | -4.24x | CA$-64.38K | CA$15.20K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2002 | -3.52x | CA$-50.35K | CA$14.30K | ▼ -693.4% |
| 2001 | 0.59x | CA$13.29K | CA$22.40K | ▲ +106.7% |
| 2000 | -8.82x | CA$-116.44K | CA$13.20K | ▼ -104.4% |
| 1999 | -4.32x | CA$-58.88K | CA$13.64K | ▼ -7.9% |
| 1998 | -4.00x | CA$-271.28K | CA$67.82K | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1997 | 3.00x | CA$823.84K | CA$274.61K | ▲ +400.0% |
| 1996 | -1.00x | CA$-145.12K | CA$145.12K | — |