Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$48.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$906.82 Million) in one year. See CNE FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canacol Energy Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canacol Energy Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canacol Energy Ltd. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canacol Energy Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Canacol Energy Ltd. (CNE) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$168.04 Million | CA$894.64 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | CA$95.34 Million | CA$881.75 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | CA$185.43 Million | CA$722.91 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$123.81 Million | CA$658.63 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | CA$152.32 Million | CA$542.42 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$108.35 Million | CA$511.32 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$94.01 Million | CA$499.57 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$65.35 Million | CA$457.30 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$73.58 Million | CA$411.12 Million | ▲ +927.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$6.36 Million | CA$365.06 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$64.44 Million | CA$328.11 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$77.94 Million | CA$356.30 Million | ▲ +70.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | CA$29.55 Million | CA$229.84 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | CA$36.74 Million | CA$115.73 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | CA$47.80 Million | CA$115.53 Million | ▲ +8620.9% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | CA$-219.00K | CA$45.11 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | CA$-2.28 Million | CA$41.26 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | CA$-6.64 Million | CA$76.00 Million | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2006 | -2.37x | CA$-4.95 Million | CA$2.09 Million | ▼ -661.5% |
| 2005 | -0.31x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$3.54 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2003 | -4.24x | CA$-64.38K | CA$15.20K | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2002 | -3.52x | CA$-50.35K | CA$14.30K | ▼ -693.4% |
| 2001 | 0.59x | CA$13.29K | CA$22.40K | ▲ +106.7% |
| 2000 | -8.82x | CA$-116.44K | CA$13.20K | ▼ -104.4% |
| 1999 | -4.32x | CA$-58.88K | CA$13.64K | ▼ -7.9% |
| 1998 | -4.00x | CA$-271.28K | CA$67.82K | ▼ -233.3% |
| 1997 | 3.00x | CA$823.84K | CA$274.61K | ▲ +400.0% |
| 1996 | -1.00x | CA$-145.12K | CA$145.12K | — |