Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust (D-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust (D-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-4.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.35 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trus to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust across 30 annual periods. Also explore Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trus (D-UN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dream Office Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see D-UN market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | CA$13.74 Million | CA$1.37 Billion | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | CA$72.39 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$70.72 Million | CA$1.47 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | CA$76.67 Million | CA$1.53 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$95.81 Million | CA$1.52 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$94.29 Million | CA$1.39 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$122.23 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▲ +198.0% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | CA$46.53 Million | CA$1.63 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | CA$79.82 Million | CA$1.59 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$147.37 Million | CA$3.11 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$192.51 Million | CA$3.28 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | CA$203.35 Million | CA$3.25 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$195.24 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | CA$134.07 Million | CA$3.06 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | CA$89.91 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | CA$79.38 Million | CA$1.37 Billion | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | CA$59.51 Million | CA$936.09 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | CA$41.13 Million | CA$951.54 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | CA$83.97 Million | CA$748.30 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | CA$87.86 Million | CA$1.24 Billion | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$62.99 Million | CA$989.00 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$45.01 Million | CA$732.99 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | CA$20.25 Million | CA$611.22 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | CA$53.88 Million | CA$699.31 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | CA$27.57 Million | CA$656.00 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$39.85 Million | CA$643.53 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | CA$26.10 Million | CA$619.80 Million | ▲ +169.2% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-34.70 Million | CA$570.10 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 1997 | -0.37x | CA$-29.50 Million | CA$80.50 Million | ▼ -632.6% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | CA$1.50 Million | CA$21.80 Million | — |