Entree Resources Ltd (ETG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Entree Resources Ltd (ETG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$83.39 Million) in one year. See Entree Resources Ltd (ETG) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Entree Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Entree Resources Ltd across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Entree Resources Ltd cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Entree Resources Ltd (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Entree Resources Ltd. Check Entree Resources Ltd (ETG) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | CA$-3.53K | CA$75.00 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | CA$-3.10 Million | CA$71.83 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$65.03 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2021 | -0.03x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$62.88 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$58.17 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-1.82 Million | CA$53.08 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 2018 | -0.02x | CA$-777.00K | CA$47.18 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$32.75 Million | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2016 | -0.30x | CA$-10.21 Million | CA$33.79 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2015 | -0.24x | CA$-9.82 Million | CA$40.67 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2014 | -0.27x | CA$-12.62 Million | CA$46.17 Million | ▼ -151.0% |
| 2013 | 0.54x | CA$27.98 Million | CA$52.22 Million | ▲ +166.3% |
| 2012 | -0.81x | CA$-12.80 Million | CA$15.85 Million | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2011 | -1.44x | CA$-22.39 Million | CA$15.52 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2010 | -0.91x | CA$-15.97 Million | CA$17.64 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2009 | -7.26x | CA$-13.34 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2008 | -8.29x | CA$-10.51 Million | CA$1.27 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2007 | -15.32x | CA$-9.25 Million | CA$603.62K | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2006 | -23.83x | CA$-8.49 Million | CA$356.23K | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2005 | -17.79x | CA$-8.94 Million | CA$502.45K | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2004 | -17.19x | CA$-3.42 Million | CA$198.76K | ▼ -431.1% |
| 2003 | -3.24x | CA$-417.63K | CA$129.00K | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2000 | -6.62x | CA$-19.16K | CA$2.89K | ▲ +71.8% |
| 1999 | -23.47x | CA$-51.62K | CA$2.20K | ▼ -1156.5% |
| 1998 | -1.87x | CA$-17.25K | CA$9.24K | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1997 | -18.97x | CA$-94.00K | CA$4.95K | ▼ -8459.4% |
| 1996 | -0.22x | CA$-13.83K | CA$62.40K | — |