Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Firan Technology Group Corporation (FTG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$7.18 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$70.91 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Firan Technology Group Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Firan Technology Group Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Firan Technology Group Corporation across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Firan Technology Group Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Firan Technology Group Corporation (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Firan Technology Group Corporation. Check earnings quality score of Firan Technology Group Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | CA$17.48 Million | CA$75.78 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | CA$14.13 Million | CA$62.14 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$11.30 Million | CA$65.38 Million | ▼ -47.1% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | CA$11.26 Million | CA$34.45 Million | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2021 | 0.27x | CA$7.63 Million | CA$28.41 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2020 | 0.45x | CA$15.78 Million | CA$35.39 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2019 | 0.46x | CA$11.91 Million | CA$25.62 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | CA$11.77 Million | CA$28.83 Million | ▲ +109.3% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | CA$6.03 Million | CA$30.91 Million | ▲ +251.8% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | CA$-4.36 Million | CA$33.91 Million | ▼ -142.6% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | CA$5.77 Million | CA$19.13 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | CA$3.39 Million | CA$18.00 Million | ▲ +10018.9% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | CA$-33.00K | CA$17.38 Million | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$995.00K | CA$14.58 Million | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2011 | 0.31x | CA$4.42 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▲ +64.7% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | CA$2.60 Million | CA$13.84 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | 0.23x | CA$3.29 Million | CA$14.18 Million | ▲ +676.8% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | CA$620.00K | CA$20.79 Million | ▲ +277.2% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | CA$-257.00K | CA$15.27 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | CA$2.54 Million | CA$15.12 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | CA$2.54 Million | CA$13.25 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$2.47 Million | CA$12.73 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | CA$3.02 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▲ +936.9% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-265.00K | CA$9.24 Million | ▼ -107.7% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | CA$3.99 Million | CA$10.77 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2000 | 0.37x | CA$4.21 Million | CA$11.43 Million | ▲ +1003.6% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$300.00K | CA$9.00 Million | ▲ +113.6% |
| 1997 | -0.24x | CA$-1.20 Million | CA$4.90 Million | — |