Genesis Land Development Corp. (GDC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Genesis Land Development Corp. (GDC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$297.77 Million) in one year. Explore GDC long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Genesis Land Development Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Genesis Land Development Corp. across 28 annual periods. Also explore GDC total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Genesis Land Development Corp. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Genesis Land Development Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Genesis Land Development Corp..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$17.74 Million | CA$302.55 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$27.55 Million | CA$290.52 Million | ▲ +341.9% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | CA$-7.80 Million | CA$198.94 Million | ▼ -218.7% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$136.80 Million | ▲ +468.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | CA$517.00K | CA$88.99 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2020 | 0.70x | CA$46.65 Million | CA$66.73 Million | ▲ +590.2% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$8.44 Million | CA$83.37 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$14.00 Million | CA$68.39 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2017 | 0.57x | CA$46.38 Million | CA$81.88 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | CA$45.65 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▲ +491.3% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-16.00 Million | CA$106.05 Million | ▼ -128.1% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | CA$42.17 Million | CA$78.47 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | CA$53.95 Million | CA$95.92 Million | ▲ +3260.8% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$157.01 Million | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$13.66 Million | CA$141.40 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | CA$36.54 Million | CA$124.78 Million | ▲ +126.5% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | CA$19.45 Million | CA$150.41 Million | ▲ +136.7% |
| 2008 | -0.35x | CA$-61.53 Million | CA$174.58 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2007 | -0.80x | CA$-99.55 Million | CA$124.55 Million | ▼ -312.1% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$17.68 Million | CA$46.92 Million | ▲ +1619.4% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$1.43 Million | CA$65.24 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | CA$-3.51 Million | CA$64.14 Million | ▼ -823.9% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | CA$512.06K | CA$67.71 Million | ▼ -95.0% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | CA$10.48 Million | CA$68.94 Million | ▲ +254.8% |
| 2001 | -0.10x | CA$-5.92 Million | CA$60.26 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | CA$-4.86 Million | CA$38.20 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$28.43 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1998 | -0.08x | CA$-5.86 Million | CA$73.96 Million | — |