Genesis Land Development Corp. (GDC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Genesis Land Development Corp. (GDC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$25.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$302.55 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Genesis Land Development Corp. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Genesis Land Development Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Genesis Land Development Corp. across 28 annual periods. Also explore GDC shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Genesis Land Development Corp. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Genesis Land Development Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Genesis Land Development Corp. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$17.74 Million | CA$302.55 Million | ▼ -38.2% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$27.55 Million | CA$290.52 Million | ▲ +341.9% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | CA$-7.80 Million | CA$198.94 Million | ▼ -218.7% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$4.52 Million | CA$136.80 Million | ▲ +468.7% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | CA$517.00K | CA$88.99 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 2020 | 0.70x | CA$46.65 Million | CA$66.73 Million | ▲ +590.2% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$8.44 Million | CA$83.37 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$14.00 Million | CA$68.39 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2017 | 0.57x | CA$46.38 Million | CA$81.88 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.59x | CA$45.65 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▲ +491.3% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-16.00 Million | CA$106.05 Million | ▼ -128.1% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | CA$42.17 Million | CA$78.47 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | CA$53.95 Million | CA$95.92 Million | ▲ +3260.8% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | CA$-2.79 Million | CA$157.01 Million | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$13.66 Million | CA$141.40 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2010 | 0.29x | CA$36.54 Million | CA$124.78 Million | ▲ +126.5% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | CA$19.45 Million | CA$150.41 Million | ▲ +136.7% |
| 2008 | -0.35x | CA$-61.53 Million | CA$174.58 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2007 | -0.80x | CA$-99.55 Million | CA$124.55 Million | ▼ -312.1% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$17.68 Million | CA$46.92 Million | ▲ +1619.4% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$1.43 Million | CA$65.24 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | CA$-3.51 Million | CA$64.14 Million | ▼ -823.9% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | CA$512.06K | CA$67.71 Million | ▼ -95.0% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | CA$10.48 Million | CA$68.94 Million | ▲ +254.8% |
| 2001 | -0.10x | CA$-5.92 Million | CA$60.26 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | CA$-4.86 Million | CA$38.20 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1999 | -0.08x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$28.43 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1998 | -0.08x | CA$-5.86 Million | CA$73.96 Million | — |