HudBay Minerals Inc (HBM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
HudBay Minerals Inc (HBM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$207.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.90 Billion) in one year. See HudBay Minerals Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
HudBay Minerals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for HudBay Minerals Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore HBM net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for HudBay Minerals Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HudBay Minerals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HudBay Minerals Inc (HBM) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | CA$672.77 Million | CA$2.99 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | CA$666.20 Million | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$476.85 Million | CA$3.11 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$487.80 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$383.82 Million | CA$3.14 Billion | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$239.48 Million | CA$2.97 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | CA$310.86 Million | CA$2.61 Billion | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$479.55 Million | CA$2.51 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | CA$539.58 Million | CA$2.50 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$475.07 Million | CA$2.69 Billion | ▲ +155.8% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$185.66 Million | CA$2.69 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | CA$250.48 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$135.35 Million | CA$2.08 Billion | ▼ -79.3% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | CA$546.68 Million | CA$1.74 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2011 | 0.40x | CA$245.07 Million | CA$620.43 Million | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2010 | 0.60x | CA$255.55 Million | CA$424.04 Million | ▲ +86.5% |
| 2009 | 0.32x | CA$101.42 Million | CA$313.83 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2008 | 0.69x | CA$202.72 Million | CA$295.52 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2007 | 1.38x | CA$503.05 Million | CA$363.92 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2006 | 1.20x | CA$363.70 Million | CA$303.97 Million | ▲ +286.2% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | CA$124.73 Million | CA$402.55 Million | ▲ +2200.2% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | CA$-6.01 Million | CA$407.55 Million | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2003 | -1.54x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$1.59 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2002 | -0.97x | CA$-610.12K | CA$627.12K | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2001 | -0.47x | CA$-468.78K | CA$1.00 Million | ▼ -292.4% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | CA$-69.82K | CA$584.41K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1999 | -0.43x | CA$-236.33K | CA$548.76K | ▼ -460.2% |
| 1998 | -0.08x | CA$-115.62K | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +86.3% |
| 1997 | -0.56x | CA$-806.61K | CA$1.44 Million | — |