High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-25.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$527.99 Million) in one year. Check HLF total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
High Liner Foods Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for High Liner Foods Incorporated across 32 annual periods. Also explore High Liner Foods Incorporated assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for High Liner Foods Incorporated (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for High Liner Foods Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HLF company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$90.59 Million | CA$443.58 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | CA$179.31 Million | CA$448.54 Million | ▲ +430.7% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-76.16 Million | CA$630.07 Million | ▼ -308.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$28.68 Million | CA$493.94 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$103.00 Million | CA$485.56 Million | ▲ +127.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$51.61 Million | CA$552.32 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$56.93 Million | CA$573.30 Million | ▲ +395.4% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-21.49 Million | CA$639.10 Million | ▼ -119.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$80.02 Million | CA$464.90 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$82.46 Million | CA$492.55 Million | ▲ +283.3% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$22.21 Million | CA$508.60 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$27.31 Million | CA$492.85 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$78.98 Million | CA$478.47 Million | ▲ +2393.8% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$3.50 Million | CA$528.52 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | CA$50.24 Million | CA$181.97 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | CA$23.02 Million | CA$137.78 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$22.46 Million | CA$148.85 Million | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$10.27 Million | CA$171.24 Million | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$17.45 Million | CA$35.98 Million | ▲ +382.6% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | CA$-8.02 Million | CA$46.76 Million | ▼ -148.2% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$13.96 Million | CA$39.24 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$6.44 Million | CA$43.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$18.54 Million | CA$75.17 Million | ▲ +529.4% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | CA$3.35 Million | CA$85.47 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | CA$15.82 Million | CA$87.98 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | CA$12.84 Million | CA$103.50 Million | ▲ +304.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-6.11 Million | CA$100.47 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | CA$12.58 Million | CA$80.15 Million | ▲ +1380.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | CA$948.63K | CA$89.46 Million | ▼ -86.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | CA$7.41 Million | CA$93.70 Million | ▲ +243.8% |
| 1994 | -0.05x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$98.55 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | CA$12.89 Million | CA$99.24 Million | — |