High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-25.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$527.99 Million) in one year. See HLF free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
High Liner Foods Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for High Liner Foods Incorporated across 32 annual periods. Also explore HLF shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for High Liner Foods Incorporated (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for High Liner Foods Incorporated. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$90.59 Million | CA$443.58 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | CA$179.31 Million | CA$448.54 Million | ▲ +430.7% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-76.16 Million | CA$630.07 Million | ▼ -308.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$28.68 Million | CA$493.94 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$103.00 Million | CA$485.56 Million | ▲ +127.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$51.61 Million | CA$552.32 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$56.93 Million | CA$573.30 Million | ▲ +395.4% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-21.49 Million | CA$639.10 Million | ▼ -119.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$80.02 Million | CA$464.90 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$82.46 Million | CA$492.55 Million | ▲ +283.3% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$22.21 Million | CA$508.60 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$27.31 Million | CA$492.85 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$78.98 Million | CA$478.47 Million | ▲ +2393.8% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$3.50 Million | CA$528.52 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | CA$50.24 Million | CA$181.97 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | CA$23.02 Million | CA$137.78 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$22.46 Million | CA$148.85 Million | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$10.27 Million | CA$171.24 Million | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$17.45 Million | CA$35.98 Million | ▲ +382.6% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | CA$-8.02 Million | CA$46.76 Million | ▼ -148.2% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$13.96 Million | CA$39.24 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$6.44 Million | CA$43.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$18.54 Million | CA$75.17 Million | ▲ +529.4% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | CA$3.35 Million | CA$85.47 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | CA$15.82 Million | CA$87.98 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | CA$12.84 Million | CA$103.50 Million | ▲ +304.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-6.11 Million | CA$100.47 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | CA$12.58 Million | CA$80.15 Million | ▲ +1380.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | CA$948.63K | CA$89.46 Million | ▼ -86.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | CA$7.41 Million | CA$93.70 Million | ▲ +243.8% |
| 1994 | -0.05x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$98.55 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | CA$12.89 Million | CA$99.24 Million | — |