High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
High Liner Foods Incorporated (HLF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-25.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$527.99 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of High Liner Foods Incorporated to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
High Liner Foods Incorporated Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for High Liner Foods Incorporated across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see High Liner Foods Incorporated operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for High Liner Foods Incorporated (1993–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for High Liner Foods Incorporated. Check how high is High Liner Foods Incorporated's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$90.59 Million | CA$443.58 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | CA$179.31 Million | CA$448.54 Million | ▲ +430.7% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-76.16 Million | CA$630.07 Million | ▼ -308.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$28.68 Million | CA$493.94 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$103.00 Million | CA$485.56 Million | ▲ +127.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$51.61 Million | CA$552.32 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$56.93 Million | CA$573.30 Million | ▲ +395.4% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-21.49 Million | CA$639.10 Million | ▼ -119.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$80.02 Million | CA$464.90 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | CA$82.46 Million | CA$492.55 Million | ▲ +283.3% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$22.21 Million | CA$508.60 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | CA$27.31 Million | CA$492.85 Million | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$78.98 Million | CA$478.47 Million | ▲ +2393.8% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$3.50 Million | CA$528.52 Million | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | CA$50.24 Million | CA$181.97 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | CA$23.02 Million | CA$137.78 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$22.46 Million | CA$148.85 Million | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$10.27 Million | CA$171.24 Million | ▼ -87.6% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$17.45 Million | CA$35.98 Million | ▲ +382.6% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | CA$-8.02 Million | CA$46.76 Million | ▼ -148.2% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$13.96 Million | CA$39.24 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$6.44 Million | CA$43.45 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | CA$18.54 Million | CA$75.17 Million | ▲ +529.4% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | CA$3.35 Million | CA$85.47 Million | ▼ -78.2% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | CA$15.82 Million | CA$87.98 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | CA$12.84 Million | CA$103.50 Million | ▲ +304.1% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-6.11 Million | CA$100.47 Million | ▼ -138.7% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | CA$12.58 Million | CA$80.15 Million | ▲ +1380.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | CA$948.63K | CA$89.46 Million | ▼ -86.6% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | CA$7.41 Million | CA$93.70 Million | ▲ +243.8% |
| 1994 | -0.05x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$98.55 Million | ▼ -142.3% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | CA$12.89 Million | CA$99.24 Million | — |