HLS Therapeutics Inc (HLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
HLS Therapeutics Inc (HLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$75.72 Million) in one year. See HLS cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
HLS Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for HLS Therapeutics Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore HLS Therapeutics Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for HLS Therapeutics Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HLS Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is HLS Therapeutics Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | CA$16.02 Million | CA$75.72 Million | ▲ +134.1% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$8.00 Million | CA$88.56 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | CA$15.79 Million | CA$111.36 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | CA$16.94 Million | CA$116.33 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$115.17 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$9.34 Million | CA$134.66 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | CA$26.41 Million | CA$141.47 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | CA$32.75 Million | CA$147.94 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | CA$27.17 Million | CA$204.26 Million | ▲ +167.6% |
| 2016 | -0.20x | CA$-108.62K | CA$552.04K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2015 | -5.15x | CA$-2.94 Million | CA$572.17K | ▼ -479.2% |
| 2014 | 1.36x | CA$18.21 Million | CA$13.42 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2013 | 1.26x | CA$18.03 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2012 | 2.44x | CA$21.23 Million | CA$8.69 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2011 | 1.33x | CA$17.92 Million | CA$13.45 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2010 | 2.06x | CA$25.06 Million | CA$12.17 Million | ▲ +578.6% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | CA$5.32 Million | CA$17.54 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2008 | 0.32x | CA$5.55 Million | CA$17.53 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | CA$21.98 Million | CA$27.90 Million | ▲ +1973.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$703.50K | CA$18.52 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | CA$12.50 Million | CA$14.18 Million | ▲ +309.6% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | CA$2.49 Million | CA$11.56 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | CA$4.92 Million | CA$14.82 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 2002 | 1.68x | CA$7.01 Million | CA$4.17 Million | ▲ +234.4% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$2.98 Million | CA$5.92 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | CA$6.59 Million | CA$13.10 Million | ▲ +157.5% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$4.56 Million | CA$23.34 Million | ▲ +5450.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-64.99K | CA$17.81 Million | ▼ -101.6% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | CA$5.52 Million | CA$24.04 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$10.09 Million | — |