HLS Therapeutics Inc (HLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
HLS Therapeutics Inc (HLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$75.72 Million) in one year. Check HLS cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
HLS Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for HLS Therapeutics Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of HLS Therapeutics Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for HLS Therapeutics Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HLS Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of HLS Therapeutics Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | CA$16.02 Million | CA$75.72 Million | ▲ +134.1% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$8.00 Million | CA$88.56 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | CA$15.79 Million | CA$111.36 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | CA$16.94 Million | CA$116.33 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$16.43 Million | CA$115.17 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$9.34 Million | CA$134.66 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | CA$26.41 Million | CA$141.47 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | CA$32.75 Million | CA$147.94 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | CA$27.17 Million | CA$204.26 Million | ▲ +167.6% |
| 2016 | -0.20x | CA$-108.62K | CA$552.04K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2015 | -5.15x | CA$-2.94 Million | CA$572.17K | ▼ -479.2% |
| 2014 | 1.36x | CA$18.21 Million | CA$13.42 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2013 | 1.26x | CA$18.03 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2012 | 2.44x | CA$21.23 Million | CA$8.69 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2011 | 1.33x | CA$17.92 Million | CA$13.45 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2010 | 2.06x | CA$25.06 Million | CA$12.17 Million | ▲ +578.6% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | CA$5.32 Million | CA$17.54 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2008 | 0.32x | CA$5.55 Million | CA$17.53 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | CA$21.98 Million | CA$27.90 Million | ▲ +1973.8% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | CA$703.50K | CA$18.52 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | CA$12.50 Million | CA$14.18 Million | ▲ +309.6% |
| 2004 | 0.22x | CA$2.49 Million | CA$11.56 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | CA$4.92 Million | CA$14.82 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 2002 | 1.68x | CA$7.01 Million | CA$4.17 Million | ▲ +234.4% |
| 2001 | 0.50x | CA$2.98 Million | CA$5.92 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | CA$6.59 Million | CA$13.10 Million | ▲ +157.5% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$4.56 Million | CA$23.34 Million | ▲ +5450.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-64.99K | CA$17.81 Million | ▼ -101.6% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | CA$5.52 Million | CA$24.04 Million | ▼ -75.0% |
| 1996 | 0.92x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$10.09 Million | — |