Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (HMM-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (HMM-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$9.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$100.67 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore HMM-A net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$33.66 Million | CA$95.25 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$90.54 Million | ▲ +234.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | CA$4.82 Million | CA$86.46 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | CA$14.92 Million | CA$68.28 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | CA$15.69 Million | CA$58.71 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$11.71 Million | CA$56.67 Million | ▲ +653.9% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | CA$1.35 Million | CA$49.41 Million | ▼ -85.1% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | CA$7.24 Million | CA$39.33 Million | ▲ +312.6% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | CA$-3.37 Million | CA$38.89 Million | ▼ -146.5% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$6.68 Million | CA$35.87 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | CA$5.53 Million | CA$21.70 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$3.60 Million | CA$22.68 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | CA$2.22 Million | CA$23.95 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | CA$1.74 Million | CA$22.45 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | CA$3.56 Million | CA$18.69 Million | ▲ +171.2% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$1.24 Million | CA$17.66 Million | ▼ -46.6% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | CA$2.86 Million | CA$21.76 Million | ▲ +209.8% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | CA$1.16 Million | CA$27.32 Million | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | CA$2.59 Million | CA$28.50 Million | ▲ +1312.8% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | CA$-179.00K | CA$23.91 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$1.86 Million | CA$20.80 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | CA$3.34 Million | CA$19.26 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$3.84 Million | CA$19.55 Million | ▲ +263.0% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | CA$1.25 Million | CA$23.06 Million | ▲ +553.4% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | CA$-717.00K | CA$60.03 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 1999 | 0.26x | CA$11.90 Million | CA$46.00 Million | ▲ +419.5% |
| 1998 | -0.08x | CA$-4.30 Million | CA$53.10 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | CA$3.10 Million | CA$41.30 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | CA$11.00 Million | CA$38.10 Million | — |