Canlan Ice Sports Corp. (ICE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canlan Ice Sports Corp. (ICE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$3.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$80.61 Million) in one year. See Canlan Ice Sports Corp. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canlan Ice Sports Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canlan Ice Sports Corp. across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Canlan Ice Sports Corp. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canlan Ice Sports Corp. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canlan Ice Sports Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ICE market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$13.81 Million | CA$81.68 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | CA$9.31 Million | CA$77.34 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$10.58 Million | CA$75.06 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | CA$12.14 Million | CA$76.20 Million | ▲ +244.5% |
| 2020 | -0.11x | CA$-8.79 Million | CA$79.78 Million | ▼ -214.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CA$8.90 Million | CA$92.78 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | CA$12.57 Million | CA$79.11 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$10.94 Million | CA$80.52 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$8.96 Million | CA$81.99 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | CA$9.98 Million | CA$76.88 Million | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | CA$7.04 Million | CA$73.24 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$6.56 Million | CA$60.60 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | CA$8.15 Million | CA$57.90 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | CA$7.14 Million | CA$60.11 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$5.43 Million | CA$63.83 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | CA$8.05 Million | CA$66.97 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | CA$8.51 Million | CA$71.28 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | CA$6.05 Million | CA$70.14 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | CA$8.69 Million | CA$73.40 Million | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2005 | 0.08x | CA$4.68 Million | CA$62.34 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | CA$4.08 Million | CA$65.14 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$4.03 Million | CA$75.19 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | CA$3.78 Million | CA$76.60 Million | ▲ +28742.1% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$13.00K | CA$75.90 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-4.36 Million | CA$76.18 Million | ▼ -273.6% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | CA$3.20 Million | CA$97.00 Million | ▼ -44.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$7.60 Million | CA$128.20 Million | ▲ +336.6% |
| 1997 | -0.03x | CA$-3.50 Million | CA$139.70 Million | ▼ -278.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | CA$2.00 Million | CA$142.10 Million | — |