InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio. InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$18.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.89 Billion) in one year. Check IIP-UN operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust across 27 annual periods. Check InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.04x | CA$67.48 Million | CA$1.80 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$89.62 Million | CA$1.86 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | CA$91.18 Million | CA$1.82 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$96.02 Million | CA$1.70 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | CA$61.94 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | CA$72.59 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +61.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | CA$40.13 Million | CA$955.20 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | CA$43.33 Million | CA$854.35 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | CA$34.37 Million | CA$784.97 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$35.31 Million | CA$724.75 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | CA$27.70 Million | CA$526.95 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | CA$41.00 Million | CA$400.56 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | CA$30.82 Million | CA$283.28 Million | ▲ +101.9% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | CA$11.32 Million | CA$210.16 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | CA$6.84 Million | CA$204.66 Million | ▲ +369.2% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | CA$1.35 Million | CA$189.95 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | CA$3.66 Million | CA$190.43 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | CA$3.93 Million | CA$189.67 Million | ▲ +238.7% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | CA$489.21K | CA$80.02 Million | ▲ +351.2% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | CA$-78.72K | CA$32.35 Million | ▼ -149.2% |
| 2004 | 0.00x | CA$66.84K | CA$13.50 Million | ▲ +136.6% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$16.63K | CA$7.95 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | CA$97.03K | CA$5.18 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$139.27K | CA$4.70 Million | ▼ -77.2% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$440.10K | CA$3.39 Million | ▲ +192.0% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | CA$-154.94K | CA$1.10 Million | ▼ -132.7% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-56.87K | CA$937.31K | — |