InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust tangible net worth ratio. InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (IIP-UN) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$2.27 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check IIP-UN strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust (1999–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust from 1999 to 2024. This chart shows how InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 26 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$2.27 Billion with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust tangible net worth ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust from 1999 to 2024, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$2.39 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$4.20 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$4.44 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$2.50 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$4.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$2.42 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$4.12 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$2.07 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$3.21 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$2.79 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$1.16 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$2.12 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$804.10 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.66 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$536.55 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$506.90 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$393.70 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$920.65 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$376.51 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$777.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$275.92 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$559.21 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$196.19 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$406.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$69.70 Million | CA$5.67K | CA$274.36 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 99.8% | CA$74.04 Million | CA$122.31K | CA$263.99 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 98.6% | CA$73.40 Million | CA$1.06 Million | CA$263.83 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2007 | 93.5% | CA$77.33 Million | CA$5.02 Million | CA$267.00 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2006 | 90.5% | CA$30.55 Million | CA$2.92 Million | CA$110.58 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$11.61 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$43.96 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$4.35 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$17.85 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$10.86 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$2.82 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$8.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$2.42 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$7.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$1.53 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.92 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$893.96K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.99 Million | — |