IAMGold Corporation (IMG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IAMGold Corporation (IMG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$280.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.79 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does IAMGold Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IAMGold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IAMGold Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of IAMGold Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IAMGold Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IAMGold Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see IMG stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.25x | CA$486.00 Million | CA$1.97 Billion | ▲ +251.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | CA$159.40 Million | CA$2.27 Billion | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$408.70 Million | CA$2.22 Billion | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | CA$285.00 Million | CA$1.65 Billion | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | CA$347.60 Million | CA$1.61 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CA$363.00 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | CA$191.10 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | CA$295.30 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | CA$314.40 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +1306.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | CA$26.00 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -90.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$312.20 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | CA$246.30 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | CA$441.00 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2011 | 0.72x | CA$589.90 Million | CA$820.81 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2010 | 0.63x | CA$415.11 Million | CA$661.27 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | CA$256.96 Million | CA$551.55 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | CA$254.52 Million | CA$481.63 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$145.58 Million | CA$435.72 Million | ▲ +168.5% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | CA$62.41 Million | CA$501.61 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2005 | 0.59x | CA$34.04 Million | CA$57.98 Million | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | CA$13.68 Million | CA$56.26 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2003 | 0.47x | CA$30.64 Million | CA$65.04 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | CA$19.00 Million | CA$38.63 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | CA$25.72 Million | CA$49.12 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | CA$19.13 Million | CA$57.48 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1999 | 0.39x | CA$27.37 Million | CA$70.23 Million | ▲ +69.0% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | CA$22.22 Million | CA$96.39 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$15.18 Million | CA$109.76 Million | ▲ +9643.6% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | CA$145.93K | CA$102.81 Million | — |