Laramide Resources Ltd. (LAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laramide Resources Ltd. (LAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.19x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.94 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Laramide Resources Ltd. to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laramide Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laramide Resources Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore LAM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laramide Resources Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laramide Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Laramide Resources Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.64x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$5.94 Million | ▼ -162.5% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$15.51 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | CA$-2.70 Million | CA$12.96 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2022 | -108.97x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$12.74K | ▼ -65677.8% |
| 2021 | -0.17x | CA$-2.96 Million | CA$17.85 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$15.33 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2019 | -0.15x | CA$-2.28 Million | CA$14.84 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2018 | -0.21x | CA$-4.16 Million | CA$19.54 Million | ▼ -126.7% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$17.49 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$9.63 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2015 | -0.20x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$10.60 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$8.54 Million | ▼ -930.6% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CA$-149.20K | CA$10.89 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$11.06 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2011 | -0.24x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$5.26 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -0.16x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$9.70 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.15x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-5.81 Million | CA$9.04 Million | ▼ -2295.0% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-565.66K | CA$21.08 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2006 | -0.37x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▼ -126.8% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-426.49K | CA$2.59 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | CA$-275.17K | CA$332.83K | ▼ -283.1% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | CA$-105.97K | CA$491.07K | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-63.65K | CA$564.46K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2001 | -0.16x | CA$-405.58K | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -138.8% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | CA$-151.07K | CA$2.27 Million | ▼ -273.0% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | CA$100.00K | CA$2.60 Million | ▲ +125.0% |
| 1998 | -0.15x | CA$-400.00K | CA$2.60 Million | ▼ -223.1% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | CA$-100.00K | CA$2.10 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 1996 | -2.33x | CA$-700.00K | CA$300.00K | — |