Laramide Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laramide Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Laramide Resources Ltd. (LAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-649.76K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.95 Million) in one year. Check LAM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Laramide Resources Ltd. (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Laramide Resources Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Laramide Resources Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Check Laramide Resources Ltd. (LAM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Laramide Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Laramide Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laramide Resources Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Laramide Resources Ltd. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.64x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$5.94 Million | ▼ -162.5% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | CA$-3.79 Million | CA$15.51 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2023 | -0.21x | CA$-2.70 Million | CA$12.96 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2022 | -108.97x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$12.74K | ▼ -65677.8% |
| 2021 | -0.17x | CA$-2.96 Million | CA$17.85 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$15.33 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2019 | -0.15x | CA$-2.28 Million | CA$14.84 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2018 | -0.21x | CA$-4.16 Million | CA$19.54 Million | ▼ -126.7% |
| 2017 | -0.09x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$17.49 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2016 | -0.19x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$9.63 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2015 | -0.20x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$10.60 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$8.54 Million | ▼ -930.6% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CA$-149.20K | CA$10.89 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$11.06 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2011 | -0.24x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$5.26 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2010 | -0.16x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$9.70 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.15x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$9.29 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2008 | -0.64x | CA$-5.81 Million | CA$9.04 Million | ▼ -2295.0% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | CA$-565.66K | CA$21.08 Million | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2006 | -0.37x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▼ -126.8% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-426.49K | CA$2.59 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | CA$-275.17K | CA$332.83K | ▼ -283.1% |
| 2003 | -0.22x | CA$-105.97K | CA$491.07K | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2002 | -0.11x | CA$-63.65K | CA$564.46K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2001 | -0.16x | CA$-405.58K | CA$2.55 Million | ▼ -138.8% |
| 2000 | -0.07x | CA$-151.07K | CA$2.27 Million | ▼ -273.0% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | CA$100.00K | CA$2.60 Million | ▲ +125.0% |
| 1998 | -0.15x | CA$-400.00K | CA$2.60 Million | ▼ -223.1% |
| 1997 | -0.05x | CA$-100.00K | CA$2.10 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 1996 | -2.33x | CA$-700.00K | CA$300.00K | — |