Linamar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Linamar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Linamar Corporation (LNR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$327.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.39 Billion) in one year. Check LNR cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Linamar Corporation (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Linamar Corporation from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Linamar Corporation across 33 annual periods. Check LNR cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Linamar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Linamar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Linamar Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Linamar Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$4.79 Billion | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$1.13 Billion | CA$5.07 Billion | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$745.37 Million | CA$4.53 Billion | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$447.71 Million | CA$3.76 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$909.46 Million | CA$2.79 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2020 | 0.44x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$3.20 Billion | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | CA$1.13 Billion | CA$3.55 Billion | ▲ +109.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$654.85 Million | CA$4.33 Billion | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$777.71 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | CA$877.16 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | CA$677.44 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2014 | 0.41x | CA$527.72 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2013 | 0.44x | CA$557.74 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▲ +84.4% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | CA$322.45 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$204.04 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$197.24 Million | CA$952.32 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | CA$298.15 Million | CA$731.25 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$258.84 Million | CA$925.36 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$216.07 Million | CA$891.30 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | CA$243.24 Million | CA$734.51 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | CA$255.41 Million | CA$734.78 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | CA$163.87 Million | CA$726.02 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$94.28 Million | CA$648.30 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | CA$163.29 Million | CA$414.19 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | CA$157.17 Million | CA$383.59 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | CA$166.11 Million | CA$362.61 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$91.90 Million | CA$336.10 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | CA$67.60 Million | CA$222.20 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 1997 | 0.89x | CA$146.90 Million | CA$165.70 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 1996 | 1.04x | CA$128.50 Million | CA$123.40 Million | ▲ +294.6% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | CA$38.40 Million | CA$145.50 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 1994 | 0.55x | CA$53.70 Million | CA$98.20 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 1993 | 0.18x | CA$16.20 Million | CA$88.90 Million | — |