Linamar Corporation (LNR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Linamar Corporation (LNR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$327.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$5.39 Billion) in one year. See Linamar Corporation (LNR) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Linamar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Linamar Corporation across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Linamar Corporation (LNR) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Linamar Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Linamar Corporation. Check LNR cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$4.79 Billion | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | CA$1.13 Billion | CA$5.07 Billion | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$745.37 Million | CA$4.53 Billion | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$447.71 Million | CA$3.76 Billion | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | CA$909.46 Million | CA$2.79 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2020 | 0.44x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$3.20 Billion | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | CA$1.13 Billion | CA$3.55 Billion | ▲ +109.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | CA$654.85 Million | CA$4.33 Billion | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | CA$777.71 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | CA$877.16 Million | CA$2.64 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2015 | 0.44x | CA$677.44 Million | CA$1.54 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2014 | 0.41x | CA$527.72 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2013 | 0.44x | CA$557.74 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | ▲ +84.4% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | CA$322.45 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$204.04 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$197.24 Million | CA$952.32 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | CA$298.15 Million | CA$731.25 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$258.84 Million | CA$925.36 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | CA$216.07 Million | CA$891.30 Million | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | CA$243.24 Million | CA$734.51 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | CA$255.41 Million | CA$734.78 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | CA$163.87 Million | CA$726.02 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$94.28 Million | CA$648.30 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2002 | 0.39x | CA$163.29 Million | CA$414.19 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | CA$157.17 Million | CA$383.59 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2000 | 0.46x | CA$166.11 Million | CA$362.61 Million | ▲ +67.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$91.90 Million | CA$336.10 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | CA$67.60 Million | CA$222.20 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 1997 | 0.89x | CA$146.90 Million | CA$165.70 Million | ▼ -14.9% |
| 1996 | 1.04x | CA$128.50 Million | CA$123.40 Million | ▲ +294.6% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | CA$38.40 Million | CA$145.50 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 1994 | 0.55x | CA$53.70 Million | CA$98.20 Million | ▲ +200.1% |
| 1993 | 0.18x | CA$16.20 Million | CA$88.90 Million | — |