Major Drilling Group International (MDI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Major Drilling Group International (MDI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$209.98 Million) in one year. Explore Major Drilling Group International strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Major Drilling Group International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Major Drilling Group International across 30 annual periods. Also explore how large is Major Drilling Group International's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Major Drilling Group International (1997–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Major Drilling Group International. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MDI market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.39x | CA$81.84 Million | CA$209.98 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2025 | 0.51x | CA$100.92 Million | CA$196.64 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2024 | 0.95x | CA$112.03 Million | CA$118.35 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | 0.71x | CA$113.19 Million | CA$159.11 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2022 | 0.48x | CA$94.87 Million | CA$197.32 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | CA$34.45 Million | CA$108.37 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | CA$42.11 Million | CA$128.87 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$20.96 Million | CA$98.30 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | CA$10.17 Million | CA$94.65 Million | ▲ +380.9% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-3.25 Million | CA$84.81 Million | ▼ -113.2% |
| 2016 | 0.29x | CA$22.33 Million | CA$77.16 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | CA$14.57 Million | CA$82.31 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | CA$40.92 Million | CA$107.38 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2013 | 0.93x | CA$136.93 Million | CA$147.90 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2012 | 0.58x | CA$114.48 Million | CA$198.27 Million | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | CA$47.85 Million | CA$144.42 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$20.78 Million | CA$97.39 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | CA$114.73 Million | CA$103.83 Million | ▲ +94.3% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | CA$79.08 Million | CA$139.06 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.59x | CA$62.97 Million | CA$107.39 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | CA$38.46 Million | CA$112.23 Million | ▲ +158.5% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | CA$15.03 Million | CA$113.35 Million | ▲ +1080.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | CA$-976.00K | CA$72.19 Million | ▼ -107.3% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | CA$12.32 Million | CA$66.76 Million | ▲ +154.1% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$3.41 Million | CA$46.94 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$8.22 Million | CA$61.55 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | CA$4.20 Million | CA$62.90 Million | ▲ +1046.8% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-500.00K | CA$70.90 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | CA$-600.00K | CA$51.00 Million | ▼ -104.2% |
| 1997 | 0.28x | CA$6.60 Million | CA$23.80 Million | — |