Maxim Power Corp. (MXG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Maxim Power Corp. (MXG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$6.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$54.29 Million) in one year. See Maxim Power Corp. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Maxim Power Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Maxim Power Corp. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Maxim Power Corp. net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Maxim Power Corp. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Maxim Power Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Maxim Power Corp..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.64x | CA$32.14 Million | CA$50.28 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2024 | 1.95x | CA$84.07 Million | CA$43.08 Million | ▲ +948.8% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | CA$23.84 Million | CA$128.09 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2022 | 0.67x | CA$76.41 Million | CA$113.45 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2021 | 1.23x | CA$105.22 Million | CA$85.25 Million | ▲ +1519.8% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$6.96 Million | CA$91.40 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$5.49 Million | CA$86.04 Million | ▲ +113.2% |
| 2018 | -0.48x | CA$-11.41 Million | CA$23.65 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2017 | -0.96x | CA$-19.89 Million | CA$20.82 Million | ▼ -326.3% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | CA$-13.61 Million | CA$60.70 Million | ▼ -448.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$8.37 Million | CA$130.11 Million | ▼ -65.8% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | CA$23.36 Million | CA$124.10 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | CA$35.56 Million | CA$124.20 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$19.32 Million | CA$132.91 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | CA$35.38 Million | CA$138.95 Million | ▲ +102.4% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$20.22 Million | CA$160.70 Million | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | CA$38.79 Million | CA$155.80 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$28.59 Million | CA$155.63 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | CA$35.49 Million | CA$121.98 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | CA$23.85 Million | CA$115.83 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | CA$21.41 Million | CA$94.94 Million | ▲ +147.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$4.04 Million | CA$44.28 Million | ▼ -59.8% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | CA$7.95 Million | CA$35.04 Million | ▲ +137.4% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | CA$2.61 Million | CA$27.28 Million | ▲ +365.1% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | CA$742.00K | CA$36.10 Million | ▲ +115.0% |
| 2000 | -0.14x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$8.47 Million | ▲ +89.4% |
| 1999 | -1.29x | CA$-945.50K | CA$731.99K | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1998 | -0.74x | CA$-355.25K | CA$481.80K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 1997 | -5.59x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$341.07K | — |