North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$53.55 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.36 Billion) in one year. Explore North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
North American Construction Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for North American Construction Group Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore NOA total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for North American Construction Group Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for North American Construction Group Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NOA stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$254.54 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$217.61 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | CA$278.09 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | CA$169.20 Million | CA$673.59 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$165.18 Million | CA$590.82 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$147.27 Million | CA$590.49 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$157.94 Million | CA$612.53 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$109.37 Million | CA$539.59 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | CA$49.74 Million | CA$237.72 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$39.83 Million | CA$191.13 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | CA$77.10 Million | CA$189.08 Million | ▲ +164.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$41.23 Million | CA$267.00 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | CA$103.23 Million | CA$253.81 Million | ▲ +137.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$91.12 Million | CA$531.99 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$63.27 Million | CA$622.21 Million | ▲ +11060.7% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | CA$-497.00K | CA$535.69 Million | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$42.87 Million | CA$521.56 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$157.78 Million | CA$482.62 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | CA$97.60 Million | CA$510.23 Million | ▲ +787.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$10.05 Million | CA$466.46 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$33.87 Million | CA$534.39 Million | ▲ +695.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$453.13 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$17.99 Million | CA$366.31 Million | ▼ -75.4% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$25.73 Million | CA$128.77 Million | ▲ +589.4% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$103.05 Million | ▲ +145.1% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-7.24 Million | CA$112.76 Million | ▼ -123.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$22.04 Million | CA$80.56 Million | — |