North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.40 Billion) in one year. See NOA financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
North American Construction Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for North American Construction Group Ltd across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for North American Construction Group Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for North American Construction Group Ltd. Check how high is North American Construction Group Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$254.54 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$217.61 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | CA$278.09 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | CA$169.20 Million | CA$673.59 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$165.18 Million | CA$590.82 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$147.27 Million | CA$590.49 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$157.94 Million | CA$612.53 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$109.37 Million | CA$539.59 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | CA$49.74 Million | CA$237.72 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$39.83 Million | CA$191.13 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | CA$77.10 Million | CA$189.08 Million | ▲ +164.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$41.23 Million | CA$267.00 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | CA$103.23 Million | CA$253.81 Million | ▲ +137.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$91.12 Million | CA$531.99 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$63.27 Million | CA$622.21 Million | ▲ +11060.7% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | CA$-497.00K | CA$535.69 Million | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$42.87 Million | CA$521.56 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$157.78 Million | CA$482.62 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | CA$97.60 Million | CA$510.23 Million | ▲ +787.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$10.05 Million | CA$466.46 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$33.87 Million | CA$534.39 Million | ▲ +695.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$453.13 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$17.99 Million | CA$366.31 Million | ▼ -75.4% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$25.73 Million | CA$128.77 Million | ▲ +589.4% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$103.05 Million | ▲ +145.1% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-7.24 Million | CA$112.76 Million | ▼ -123.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$22.04 Million | CA$80.56 Million | — |