North American Construction Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
North American Construction Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.40 Billion) in one year. Check North American Construction Group Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of North American Construction Group Ltd (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of North American Construction Group Ltd from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for North American Construction Group Ltd across 27 annual periods. Check North American Construction Group Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
North American Construction Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
North American Construction Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for North American Construction Group Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$254.54 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$217.61 Million | CA$1.31 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | CA$278.09 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | CA$169.20 Million | CA$673.59 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$165.18 Million | CA$590.82 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$147.27 Million | CA$590.49 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | CA$157.94 Million | CA$612.53 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | CA$109.37 Million | CA$539.59 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | CA$49.74 Million | CA$237.72 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | CA$39.83 Million | CA$191.13 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | CA$77.10 Million | CA$189.08 Million | ▲ +164.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$41.23 Million | CA$267.00 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | CA$103.23 Million | CA$253.81 Million | ▲ +137.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$91.12 Million | CA$531.99 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | CA$63.27 Million | CA$622.21 Million | ▲ +11060.7% |
| 2010 | 0.00x | CA$-497.00K | CA$535.69 Million | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$42.87 Million | CA$521.56 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$157.78 Million | CA$482.62 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | CA$97.60 Million | CA$510.23 Million | ▲ +787.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$10.05 Million | CA$466.46 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | CA$33.87 Million | CA$534.39 Million | ▲ +695.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | CA$-4.82 Million | CA$453.13 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | CA$17.99 Million | CA$366.31 Million | ▼ -75.4% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$25.73 Million | CA$128.77 Million | ▲ +589.4% |
| 2001 | 0.03x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$103.05 Million | ▲ +145.1% |
| 2000 | -0.06x | CA$-7.24 Million | CA$112.76 Million | ▼ -123.5% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | CA$22.04 Million | CA$80.56 Million | — |