Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$175.11 Million) in one year. See Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orvana Minerals Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orvana Minerals Corp. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Orvana Minerals Corp. cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orvana Minerals Corp. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orvana Minerals Corp.. Check how high is Orvana Minerals Corp.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | CA$16.83 Million | CA$119.86 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$16.48 Million | CA$84.64 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | CA$21.04 Million | CA$66.69 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$7.17 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | CA$16.57 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$79.97 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | CA$14.44 Million | CA$80.30 Million | ▲ +710.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$81.09 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | CA$20.73 Million | CA$82.75 Million | ▲ +411.2% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$3.44 Million | CA$70.15 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | CA$20.68 Million | CA$56.89 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | CA$34.73 Million | CA$91.92 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$32.57 Million | CA$129.57 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$41.70 Million | CA$160.32 Million | ▲ +327.7% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-12.62 Million | CA$110.48 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2010 | -0.18x | CA$-8.64 Million | CA$47.07 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | CA$19.63 Million | CA$30.24 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 1.73x | CA$41.21 Million | CA$23.82 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | CA$31.49 Million | CA$10.20 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2006 | 2.51x | CA$24.57 Million | CA$9.77 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2005 | 2.98x | CA$18.81 Million | CA$6.30 Million | ▲ +503.4% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$8.11 Million | CA$16.40 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$13.50 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | CA$-310.63K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2000 | -1.11x | CA$-723.65K | CA$649.13K | ▲ +81.4% |
| 1999 | -6.00x | CA$-2.49 Million | CA$414.74K | ▼ -10699.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-64.60K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +99.7% |
| 1997 | -17.00x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$69.95K | ▼ -14957.1% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | CA$-510.76K | CA$4.52 Million | — |