Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$175.11 Million) in one year. Check ORV cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orvana Minerals Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orvana Minerals Corp. across 29 annual periods. Also explore Orvana Minerals Corp. balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orvana Minerals Corp. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orvana Minerals Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ORV market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | CA$16.83 Million | CA$119.86 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$16.48 Million | CA$84.64 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | CA$21.04 Million | CA$66.69 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$7.17 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | CA$16.57 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$79.97 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | CA$14.44 Million | CA$80.30 Million | ▲ +710.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$81.09 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | CA$20.73 Million | CA$82.75 Million | ▲ +411.2% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$3.44 Million | CA$70.15 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | CA$20.68 Million | CA$56.89 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | CA$34.73 Million | CA$91.92 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$32.57 Million | CA$129.57 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$41.70 Million | CA$160.32 Million | ▲ +327.7% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-12.62 Million | CA$110.48 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2010 | -0.18x | CA$-8.64 Million | CA$47.07 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | CA$19.63 Million | CA$30.24 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 1.73x | CA$41.21 Million | CA$23.82 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | CA$31.49 Million | CA$10.20 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2006 | 2.51x | CA$24.57 Million | CA$9.77 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2005 | 2.98x | CA$18.81 Million | CA$6.30 Million | ▲ +503.4% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$8.11 Million | CA$16.40 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$13.50 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | CA$-310.63K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2000 | -1.11x | CA$-723.65K | CA$649.13K | ▲ +81.4% |
| 1999 | -6.00x | CA$-2.49 Million | CA$414.74K | ▼ -10699.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-64.60K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +99.7% |
| 1997 | -17.00x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$69.95K | ▼ -14957.1% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | CA$-510.76K | CA$4.52 Million | — |