Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-813.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$165.46 Million) in one year. See Orvana Minerals Corp. free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orvana Minerals Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orvana Minerals Corp. across 29 annual periods. Also explore ORV shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orvana Minerals Corp. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orvana Minerals Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ORV stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.14x | CA$16.83 Million | CA$119.86 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$16.48 Million | CA$84.64 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | CA$21.04 Million | CA$66.69 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$7.17 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | CA$16.57 Million | CA$75.07 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$79.97 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | CA$14.44 Million | CA$80.30 Million | ▲ +710.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$81.09 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | CA$20.73 Million | CA$82.75 Million | ▲ +411.2% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$3.44 Million | CA$70.15 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | CA$20.68 Million | CA$56.89 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | CA$34.73 Million | CA$91.92 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | CA$32.57 Million | CA$129.57 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | CA$41.70 Million | CA$160.32 Million | ▲ +327.7% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-12.62 Million | CA$110.48 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2010 | -0.18x | CA$-8.64 Million | CA$47.07 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | CA$19.63 Million | CA$30.24 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 1.73x | CA$41.21 Million | CA$23.82 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | CA$31.49 Million | CA$10.20 Million | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2006 | 2.51x | CA$24.57 Million | CA$9.77 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2005 | 2.98x | CA$18.81 Million | CA$6.30 Million | ▲ +503.4% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$8.11 Million | CA$16.40 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$13.50 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | CA$-310.63K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2000 | -1.11x | CA$-723.65K | CA$649.13K | ▲ +81.4% |
| 1999 | -6.00x | CA$-2.49 Million | CA$414.74K | ▼ -10699.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | CA$-64.60K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +99.7% |
| 1997 | -17.00x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$69.95K | ▼ -14957.1% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | CA$-510.76K | CA$4.52 Million | — |