Parkland Fuel Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Parkland Fuel Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$502.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$10.44 Billion) in one year. Check Parkland Fuel Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Parkland Fuel Corporation (1992–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Parkland Fuel Corporation from 1992 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Parkland Fuel Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Parkland Fuel Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2024)
Parkland Fuel Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Parkland Fuel Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Parkland Fuel Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$1.53 Billion | CA$10.88 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$1.78 Billion | CA$10.69 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$11.25 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$904.00 Million | CA$9.22 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$934.00 Million | CA$6.83 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$897.00 Million | CA$6.97 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | CA$461.00 Million | CA$3.86 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$3.77 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$165.30 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | CA$223.29 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | CA$171.19 Million | CA$961.94 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$133.13 Million | CA$825.40 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CA$136.38 Million | CA$550.72 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | CA$89.61 Million | CA$637.25 Million | ▲ +1938.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | CA$4.47 Million | CA$647.69 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | CA$112.39 Million | CA$283.58 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$71.62 Million | CA$213.93 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | CA$82.84 Million | CA$167.01 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2006 | 0.74x | CA$70.25 Million | CA$94.40 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | CA$34.81 Million | CA$74.92 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$30.57 Million | CA$62.39 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | CA$31.28 Million | CA$57.44 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$24.66 Million | CA$76.10 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$69.94 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$56.06 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | CA$11.80 Million | CA$44.70 Million | ▲ +610.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | CA$2.10 Million | CA$56.50 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | CA$6.30 Million | CA$53.00 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$51.70 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | CA$10.40 Million | CA$50.90 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | CA$7.00 Million | CA$52.10 Million | — |