Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$502.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$10.44 Billion) in one year. See PKI financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Parkland Fuel Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Parkland Fuel Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Parkland Fuel Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Parkland Fuel Corporation (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Parkland Fuel Corporation. Check PKI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$1.53 Billion | CA$10.88 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$1.78 Billion | CA$10.69 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$11.25 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$904.00 Million | CA$9.22 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$934.00 Million | CA$6.83 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$897.00 Million | CA$6.97 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | CA$461.00 Million | CA$3.86 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$3.77 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$165.30 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | CA$223.29 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | CA$171.19 Million | CA$961.94 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$133.13 Million | CA$825.40 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CA$136.38 Million | CA$550.72 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | CA$89.61 Million | CA$637.25 Million | ▲ +1938.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | CA$4.47 Million | CA$647.69 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | CA$112.39 Million | CA$283.58 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$71.62 Million | CA$213.93 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | CA$82.84 Million | CA$167.01 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2006 | 0.74x | CA$70.25 Million | CA$94.40 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | CA$34.81 Million | CA$74.92 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$30.57 Million | CA$62.39 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | CA$31.28 Million | CA$57.44 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$24.66 Million | CA$76.10 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$69.94 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$56.06 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | CA$11.80 Million | CA$44.70 Million | ▲ +610.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | CA$2.10 Million | CA$56.50 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | CA$6.30 Million | CA$53.00 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$51.70 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | CA$10.40 Million | CA$50.90 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | CA$7.00 Million | CA$52.10 Million | — |