Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$502.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$10.44 Billion) in one year. Explore PKI long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Parkland Fuel Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Parkland Fuel Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore PKI total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Parkland Fuel Corporation (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Parkland Fuel Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PKI market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$1.53 Billion | CA$10.88 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$1.78 Billion | CA$10.69 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$11.25 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$904.00 Million | CA$9.22 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$934.00 Million | CA$6.83 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$897.00 Million | CA$6.97 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | CA$461.00 Million | CA$3.86 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$3.77 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$165.30 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | CA$223.29 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | CA$171.19 Million | CA$961.94 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$133.13 Million | CA$825.40 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CA$136.38 Million | CA$550.72 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | CA$89.61 Million | CA$637.25 Million | ▲ +1938.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | CA$4.47 Million | CA$647.69 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | CA$112.39 Million | CA$283.58 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$71.62 Million | CA$213.93 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | CA$82.84 Million | CA$167.01 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2006 | 0.74x | CA$70.25 Million | CA$94.40 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | CA$34.81 Million | CA$74.92 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$30.57 Million | CA$62.39 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | CA$31.28 Million | CA$57.44 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$24.66 Million | CA$76.10 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$69.94 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$56.06 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | CA$11.80 Million | CA$44.70 Million | ▲ +610.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | CA$2.10 Million | CA$56.50 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | CA$6.30 Million | CA$53.00 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$51.70 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | CA$10.40 Million | CA$50.90 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | CA$7.00 Million | CA$52.10 Million | — |