Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$502.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$10.44 Billion) in one year. See Parkland Fuel Corporation free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Parkland Fuel Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Parkland Fuel Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Parkland Fuel Corporation (PKI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Parkland Fuel Corporation (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Parkland Fuel Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PKI stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$1.53 Billion | CA$10.88 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$1.78 Billion | CA$10.69 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | CA$1.33 Billion | CA$11.25 Billion | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$904.00 Million | CA$9.22 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | CA$934.00 Million | CA$6.83 Billion | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | CA$897.00 Million | CA$6.97 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | CA$461.00 Million | CA$3.86 Billion | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$3.77 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | CA$165.30 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | CA$223.29 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | CA$171.19 Million | CA$961.94 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$133.13 Million | CA$825.40 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | CA$136.38 Million | CA$550.72 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | CA$89.61 Million | CA$637.25 Million | ▲ +1938.0% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | CA$4.47 Million | CA$647.69 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 2009 | 0.40x | CA$112.39 Million | CA$283.58 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | CA$71.62 Million | CA$213.93 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | CA$82.84 Million | CA$167.01 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2006 | 0.74x | CA$70.25 Million | CA$94.40 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | CA$34.81 Million | CA$74.92 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.49x | CA$30.57 Million | CA$62.39 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | CA$31.28 Million | CA$57.44 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$24.66 Million | CA$76.10 Million | ▲ +95.2% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | CA$11.61 Million | CA$69.94 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | CA$11.44 Million | CA$56.06 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 1998 | 0.47x | CA$20.70 Million | CA$44.30 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 1997 | 0.26x | CA$11.80 Million | CA$44.70 Million | ▲ +610.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | CA$2.10 Million | CA$56.50 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | CA$6.30 Million | CA$53.00 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | CA$10.00 Million | CA$51.70 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | CA$10.40 Million | CA$50.90 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | CA$7.00 Million | CA$52.10 Million | — |