Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$327.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.27 Billion) in one year. See Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pembina Pipeline Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pembina Pipeline Corp across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pembina Pipeline Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pembina Pipeline Corp. Check Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | CA$3.27 Billion | CA$18.78 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$3.19 Billion | CA$18.46 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$2.62 Billion | CA$16.80 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$15.69 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$2.62 Billion | CA$17.09 Billion | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | CA$2.21 Billion | CA$16.40 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$2.49 Billion | CA$16.38 Billion | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$2.22 Billion | CA$12.26 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$1.45 Billion | CA$11.72 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | CA$1.00 Billion | CA$6.72 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | CA$733.00 Million | CA$5.51 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$756.00 Million | CA$4.93 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$651.00 Million | CA$3.97 Billion | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | CA$359.81 Million | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | CA$287.09 Million | CA$2.38 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | CA$257.19 Million | CA$1.63 Billion | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | CA$224.62 Million | CA$1.45 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$219.91 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | CA$189.54 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | CA$143.86 Million | CA$823.72 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | CA$112.36 Million | CA$815.51 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | CA$120.17 Million | CA$893.85 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | CA$103.90 Million | CA$648.37 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$106.98 Million | CA$522.95 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | CA$92.89 Million | CA$528.49 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | CA$52.06 Million | CA$543.68 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 1999 | 3.50x | CA$59.25 Million | CA$16.91 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1998 | 7.44x | CA$63.58 Million | CA$8.54 Million | — |