Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pembina Pipeline Corp (PPL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$327.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.27 Billion) in one year. Explore Pembina Pipeline Corp long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pembina Pipeline Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pembina Pipeline Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore how large is Pembina Pipeline Corp's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pembina Pipeline Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pembina Pipeline Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Pembina Pipeline Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | CA$3.27 Billion | CA$18.78 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$3.19 Billion | CA$18.46 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$2.62 Billion | CA$16.80 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$15.69 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$2.62 Billion | CA$17.09 Billion | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | CA$2.21 Billion | CA$16.40 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$2.49 Billion | CA$16.38 Billion | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$2.22 Billion | CA$12.26 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$1.45 Billion | CA$11.72 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | CA$1.00 Billion | CA$6.72 Billion | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2015 | 0.13x | CA$733.00 Million | CA$5.51 Billion | ▼ -13.4% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | CA$756.00 Million | CA$4.93 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | CA$651.00 Million | CA$3.97 Billion | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | CA$359.81 Million | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | CA$287.09 Million | CA$2.38 Billion | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | CA$257.19 Million | CA$1.63 Billion | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | CA$224.62 Million | CA$1.45 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$219.91 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | CA$189.54 Million | CA$1.06 Billion | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | CA$143.86 Million | CA$823.72 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | CA$112.36 Million | CA$815.51 Million | ▲ +2.5% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | CA$120.17 Million | CA$893.85 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | CA$103.90 Million | CA$648.37 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | CA$106.98 Million | CA$522.95 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | CA$92.89 Million | CA$528.49 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | CA$52.06 Million | CA$543.68 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 1999 | 3.50x | CA$59.25 Million | CA$16.91 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1998 | 7.44x | CA$63.58 Million | CA$8.54 Million | — |