Starcore International Mines Ltd (SAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Starcore International Mines Ltd (SAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-119.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$16.40 Million) in one year. Check SAM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Starcore International Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Starcore International Mines Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Starcore International Mines Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Starcore International Mines Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Starcore International Mines Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Starcore International Mines Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$15.12 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$1.89 Million | CA$11.37 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2023 | -0.19x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$12.13 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | CA$5.83 Million | CA$11.99 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2021 | 0.76x | CA$7.73 Million | CA$10.19 Million | ▲ +373.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$2.74 Million | CA$17.11 Million | ▲ +36058.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | CA$-8.00K | CA$17.97 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2018 | -0.39x | CA$-6.01 Million | CA$15.38 Million | ▼ -425.9% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$2.06 Million | CA$17.18 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$5.27 Million | CA$21.03 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$3.23 Million | CA$17.09 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2014 | 0.67x | CA$11.74 Million | CA$17.55 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.81x | CA$13.98 Million | CA$17.31 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2012 | 0.79x | CA$17.80 Million | CA$22.48 Million | ▲ +1186.7% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$34.52 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | CA$3.54 Million | CA$31.30 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$21.09 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$3.65 Million | CA$25.00 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$25.82 Million | ▲ +102.2% |
| 2006 | -6.20x | CA$-581.30K | CA$93.76K | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2005 | -6.95x | CA$-461.61K | CA$66.44K | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2004 | -11.08x | CA$-331.58K | CA$29.91K | ▼ -50678.6% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-6.38K | CA$292.42K | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | CA$-97.03K | CA$178.81K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2001 | -5.31x | CA$-296.39K | CA$55.77K | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -5.08x | CA$-395.47K | CA$77.80K | ▼ -713.4% |
| 1999 | -0.62x | CA$-78.52K | CA$125.64K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 1998 | -1.73x | CA$-150.67K | CA$86.90K | — |