Starcore International Mines Ltd (SAM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Starcore International Mines Ltd (SAM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of July 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-119.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$16.40 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Starcore International Mines Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Starcore International Mines Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Starcore International Mines Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Starcore International Mines Ltd (SAM) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Starcore International Mines Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Starcore International Mines Ltd. Check SAM cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | CA$2.35 Million | CA$15.12 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | CA$1.89 Million | CA$11.37 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2023 | -0.19x | CA$-2.32 Million | CA$12.13 Million | ▼ -139.3% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | CA$5.83 Million | CA$11.99 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2021 | 0.76x | CA$7.73 Million | CA$10.19 Million | ▲ +373.7% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$2.74 Million | CA$17.11 Million | ▲ +36058.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | CA$-8.00K | CA$17.97 Million | ▲ +99.9% |
| 2018 | -0.39x | CA$-6.01 Million | CA$15.38 Million | ▼ -425.9% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$2.06 Million | CA$17.18 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | CA$5.27 Million | CA$21.03 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | CA$3.23 Million | CA$17.09 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2014 | 0.67x | CA$11.74 Million | CA$17.55 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.81x | CA$13.98 Million | CA$17.31 Million | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2012 | 0.79x | CA$17.80 Million | CA$22.48 Million | ▲ +1186.7% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$34.52 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | CA$3.54 Million | CA$31.30 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$2.99 Million | CA$21.09 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | CA$3.65 Million | CA$25.00 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | CA$3.52 Million | CA$25.82 Million | ▲ +102.2% |
| 2006 | -6.20x | CA$-581.30K | CA$93.76K | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2005 | -6.95x | CA$-461.61K | CA$66.44K | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2004 | -11.08x | CA$-331.58K | CA$29.91K | ▼ -50678.6% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-6.38K | CA$292.42K | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | CA$-97.03K | CA$178.81K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2001 | -5.31x | CA$-296.39K | CA$55.77K | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2000 | -5.08x | CA$-395.47K | CA$77.80K | ▼ -713.4% |
| 1999 | -0.62x | CA$-78.52K | CA$125.64K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 1998 | -1.73x | CA$-150.67K | CA$86.90K | — |