NXT Energy Solutions Inc (SFD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NXT Energy Solutions Inc (SFD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.43x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.08 Million) in one year. Check SFD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NXT Energy Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NXT Energy Solutions Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore NXT Energy Solutions Inc (SFD) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NXT Energy Solutions Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NXT Energy Solutions Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is NXT Energy Solutions Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | CA$1.16 Million | CA$4.45 Million | ▲ +194.1% |
| 2024 | -0.28x | CA$-3.97 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2023 | -0.73x | CA$-4.83 Million | CA$6.64 Million | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2022 | -0.84x | CA$-2.93 Million | CA$3.48 Million | ▼ -179.3% |
| 2021 | -0.30x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$3.43 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2020 | -1.06x | CA$-3.45 Million | CA$3.26 Million | ▼ -204.1% |
| 2019 | 1.02x | CA$4.08 Million | CA$4.01 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2018 | -5.76x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$1.05 Million | ▼ -147.2% |
| 2017 | -2.33x | CA$-5.46 Million | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2016 | -8.65x | CA$-7.59 Million | CA$877.61K | ▼ -528.1% |
| 2015 | 2.02x | CA$6.98 Million | CA$3.46 Million | ▲ +147.0% |
| 2014 | -4.30x | CA$-3.58 Million | CA$832.63K | ▼ -2687.8% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | CA$-774.96K | CA$5.02 Million | ▼ -143.7% |
| 2012 | 0.35x | CA$792.99K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +164.2% |
| 2011 | -0.55x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$3.19 Million | ▲ +86.7% |
| 2010 | -4.14x | CA$-2.69 Million | CA$649.87K | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2009 | -2.65x | CA$-2.58 Million | CA$972.32K | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2008 | -2.59x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$700.65K | ▼ -331.9% |
| 2007 | 1.12x | CA$3.68 Million | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +266.0% |
| 2006 | -0.67x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | CA$-1.27 Million | CA$4.45 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2004 | -3.22x | CA$-3.35 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▼ -632.5% |
| 2003 | -0.44x | CA$-391.68K | CA$890.95K | ▲ +96.9% |
| 2002 | -14.25x | CA$-3.34 Million | CA$234.62K | ▼ -1598.0% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | CA$-3.06 Million | CA$3.65 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2000 | -0.68x | CA$-2.63 Million | CA$3.87 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 1999 | -1.47x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$872.36K | ▲ +75.2% |
| 1998 | -5.92x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$272.89K | — |