Surge Energy Inc. (SGY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Surge Energy Inc. (SGY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$59.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$676.30 Million) in one year. See Surge Energy Inc. free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Surge Energy Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Surge Energy Inc. across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Surge Energy Inc. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Surge Energy Inc. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Surge Energy Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SGY market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | CA$265.90 Million | CA$599.53 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2024 | 0.44x | CA$278.65 Million | CA$627.64 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2023 | 0.42x | CA$266.14 Million | CA$636.79 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2022 | 0.39x | CA$276.12 Million | CA$711.75 Million | ▲ +194.2% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | CA$100.48 Million | CA$762.06 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | CA$72.19 Million | CA$774.18 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$149.42 Million | CA$754.55 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | CA$121.91 Million | CA$732.22 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | CA$93.68 Million | CA$455.94 Million | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | CA$55.32 Million | CA$336.08 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | CA$107.44 Million | CA$333.15 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | CA$207.48 Million | CA$909.50 Million | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$113.03 Million | CA$522.53 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | CA$92.86 Million | CA$330.44 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | CA$56.64 Million | CA$191.91 Million | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | CA$16.13 Million | CA$123.16 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$16.34 Million | CA$75.52 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2008 | 0.35x | CA$28.33 Million | CA$80.37 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | CA$21.36 Million | CA$75.71 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | CA$23.69 Million | CA$81.38 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | CA$28.21 Million | CA$63.75 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | CA$18.63 Million | CA$53.30 Million | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | CA$9.51 Million | CA$36.03 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | CA$4.83 Million | CA$22.06 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | CA$4.77 Million | CA$9.24 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2000 | 0.51x | CA$3.44 Million | CA$6.82 Million | ▲ +909.8% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | CA$168.51K | CA$3.37 Million | ▲ +103.3% |
| 1998 | -1.50x | CA$-6.23K | CA$4.16K | — |