Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$11.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$116.38 Million) in one year. See STC cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sangoma Technologies Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sangoma Technologies Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore Sangoma Technologies Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sangoma Technologies Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sangoma Technologies Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see STC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | CA$41.79 Million | CA$92.35 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$44.25 Million | CA$140.91 Million | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$26.49 Million | CA$176.63 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$21.06 Million | CA$204.72 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$15.70 Million | CA$164.12 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$8.72 Million | CA$73.91 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$8.73 Million | CA$41.58 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | CA$5.31 Million | CA$12.33 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2017 | 0.65x | CA$3.97 Million | CA$6.09 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.93x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$3.50 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2014 | 1.57x | CA$3.05 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2013 | 1.15x | CA$1.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +301.0% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$712.45K | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2011 | 1.25x | CA$2.77 Million | CA$2.21 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2010 | 1.37x | CA$3.13 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2009 | 1.08x | CA$3.61 Million | CA$3.34 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2008 | 2.01x | CA$3.78 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2007 | 2.30x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$921.42K | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 1.86x | CA$893.02K | CA$479.57K | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 2.95x | CA$758.67K | CA$257.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2004 | 1.58x | CA$513.37K | CA$324.13K | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2003 | 3.39x | CA$1.04 Million | CA$306.38K | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2002 | 3.49x | CA$692.27K | CA$198.40K | ▲ +290.1% |
| 2001 | -1.84x | CA$-826.96K | CA$450.65K | ▼ -1057.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$207.13K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-69.88K | CA$194.97K | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-69.88K | CA$209.64K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1997 | -0.75x | CA$-218.91K | CA$291.88K | — |