Sangoma Technologies Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sangoma Technologies Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$11.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$116.38 Million) in one year. Check Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sangoma Technologies Corp (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sangoma Technologies Corp from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sangoma Technologies Corp across 29 annual periods. Check Sangoma Technologies Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Sangoma Technologies Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Sangoma Technologies Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sangoma Technologies Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sangoma Technologies Corp operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | CA$41.79 Million | CA$92.35 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$44.25 Million | CA$140.91 Million | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$26.49 Million | CA$176.63 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$21.06 Million | CA$204.72 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$15.70 Million | CA$164.12 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$8.72 Million | CA$73.91 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$8.73 Million | CA$41.58 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | CA$5.31 Million | CA$12.33 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2017 | 0.65x | CA$3.97 Million | CA$6.09 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.93x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$3.50 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2014 | 1.57x | CA$3.05 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2013 | 1.15x | CA$1.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +301.0% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$712.45K | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2011 | 1.25x | CA$2.77 Million | CA$2.21 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2010 | 1.37x | CA$3.13 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2009 | 1.08x | CA$3.61 Million | CA$3.34 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2008 | 2.01x | CA$3.78 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2007 | 2.30x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$921.42K | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 1.86x | CA$893.02K | CA$479.57K | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 2.95x | CA$758.67K | CA$257.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2004 | 1.58x | CA$513.37K | CA$324.13K | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2003 | 3.39x | CA$1.04 Million | CA$306.38K | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2002 | 3.49x | CA$692.27K | CA$198.40K | ▲ +290.1% |
| 2001 | -1.84x | CA$-826.96K | CA$450.65K | ▼ -1057.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$207.13K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-69.88K | CA$194.97K | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-69.88K | CA$209.64K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1997 | -0.75x | CA$-218.91K | CA$291.88K | — |