Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sangoma Technologies Corp (STC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$11.91 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$116.38 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Sangoma Technologies Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sangoma Technologies Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sangoma Technologies Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Sangoma Technologies Corp.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sangoma Technologies Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sangoma Technologies Corp. Check STC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | CA$41.79 Million | CA$92.35 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2024 | 0.31x | CA$44.25 Million | CA$140.91 Million | ▲ +109.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$26.49 Million | CA$176.63 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$21.06 Million | CA$204.72 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | CA$15.70 Million | CA$164.12 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$8.72 Million | CA$73.91 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$8.73 Million | CA$41.58 Million | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2018 | 0.43x | CA$5.31 Million | CA$12.33 Million | ▼ -33.9% |
| 2017 | 0.65x | CA$3.97 Million | CA$6.09 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | 0.93x | CA$3.27 Million | CA$3.50 Million | ▲ +67.1% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | CA$2.69 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2014 | 1.57x | CA$3.05 Million | CA$1.94 Million | ▲ +36.4% |
| 2013 | 1.15x | CA$1.99 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +301.0% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | CA$712.45K | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2011 | 1.25x | CA$2.77 Million | CA$2.21 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2010 | 1.37x | CA$3.13 Million | CA$2.29 Million | ▲ +26.4% |
| 2009 | 1.08x | CA$3.61 Million | CA$3.34 Million | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2008 | 2.01x | CA$3.78 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2007 | 2.30x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$921.42K | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2006 | 1.86x | CA$893.02K | CA$479.57K | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2005 | 2.95x | CA$758.67K | CA$257.00K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2004 | 1.58x | CA$513.37K | CA$324.13K | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2003 | 3.39x | CA$1.04 Million | CA$306.38K | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2002 | 3.49x | CA$692.27K | CA$198.40K | ▲ +290.1% |
| 2001 | -1.84x | CA$-826.96K | CA$450.65K | ▼ -1057.0% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | CA$207.13K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 1999 | -0.36x | CA$-69.88K | CA$194.97K | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | CA$-69.88K | CA$209.64K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1997 | -0.75x | CA$-218.91K | CA$291.88K | — |