Taiga Building Products Ltd. (TBL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taiga Building Products Ltd. (TBL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.19x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-54.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$284.53 Million) in one year. See Taiga Building Products Ltd. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Taiga Building Products Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Taiga Building Products Ltd. across 27 annual periods. Also explore TBL shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Taiga Building Products Ltd. (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taiga Building Products Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TBL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | CA$60.59 Million | CA$213.77 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$48.17 Million | CA$239.14 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2023 | 0.47x | CA$107.53 Million | CA$228.87 Million | ▲ +122.3% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | CA$53.81 Million | CA$254.58 Million | ▼ -43.7% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | CA$118.62 Million | CA$315.95 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | CA$52.16 Million | CA$269.14 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | CA$42.22 Million | CA$255.34 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | CA$34.26 Million | CA$207.69 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | CA$64.20 Million | CA$174.99 Million | ▲ +8142.7% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$1.52 Million | CA$341.93 Million | ▼ -97.8% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | CA$67.16 Million | CA$332.15 Million | ▲ +245.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | CA$22.63 Million | CA$386.30 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$27.01 Million | CA$369.11 Million | ▲ +348.6% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | CA$-11.97 Million | CA$406.89 Million | ▼ -234.9% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CA$-3.24 Million | CA$368.99 Million | ▼ -117.1% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | CA$18.02 Million | CA$350.16 Million | ▲ +74.2% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | CA$10.88 Million | CA$368.50 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | CA$41.72 Million | CA$352.19 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | CA$16.03 Million | CA$388.42 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$386.98 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$9.21 Million | CA$384.95 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | CA$3.54 Million | CA$231.02 Million | ▲ +257.1% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$964.18K | CA$224.85 Million | ▲ +102.4% |
| 2002 | -0.18x | CA$-34.68 Million | CA$192.76 Million | ▼ -419.5% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | CA$8.70 Million | CA$154.45 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | CA$46.37 Million | CA$143.66 Million | ▲ +214.5% |
| 1999 | -0.28x | CA$-52.04 Million | CA$184.60 Million | — |