Transcontinental Inc (TCL-B) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transcontinental Inc (TCL-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$3.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.37 Billion) in one year. See TCL-B FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transcontinental Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transcontinental Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Transcontinental Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transcontinental Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transcontinental Inc. Check Transcontinental Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | CA$314.90 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | CA$370.40 Million | CA$1.73 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | CA$422.80 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▲ +143.0% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | CA$186.10 Million | CA$1.92 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | CA$283.00 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$384.40 Million | CA$1.86 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | CA$367.60 Million | CA$2.09 Billion | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$280.90 Million | CA$2.15 Billion | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | CA$307.90 Million | CA$918.00 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | CA$265.00 Million | CA$993.50 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | CA$269.30 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CA$321.20 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | CA$415.90 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▲ +141.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$203.80 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▼ -39.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$304.10 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +121.9% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$164.20 Million | CA$1.35 Billion | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$78.80 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -71.0% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | CA$287.00 Million | CA$1.51 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | CA$241.00 Million | CA$1.19 Billion | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | CA$214.00 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | CA$306.46 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2004 | 0.32x | CA$325.89 Million | CA$1.03 Billion | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | CA$217.45 Million | CA$849.52 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | CA$249.33 Million | CA$938.37 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | CA$264.45 Million | CA$768.93 Million | ▲ +123.2% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | CA$148.57 Million | CA$964.16 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 1999 | 0.23x | CA$171.10 Million | CA$749.80 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | CA$125.20 Million | CA$665.20 Million | ▼ -56.8% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | CA$182.30 Million | CA$418.90 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | CA$210.00 Million | CA$382.20 Million | ▲ +661.7% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | CA$35.00 Million | CA$485.20 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | CA$76.80 Million | CA$337.50 Million | ▲ +167.4% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | CA$29.90 Million | CA$351.30 Million | — |