TECSYS Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TECSYS Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. TECSYS Inc. (TCS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$65.54 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of TECSYS Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TECSYS Inc. (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TECSYS Inc. from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TECSYS Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check TCS total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TECSYS Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
TECSYS Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TECSYS Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of TECSYS Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$13.91 Million | CA$69.15 Million | ▲ +147.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | CA$4.86 Million | CA$59.68 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | CA$7.76 Million | CA$56.48 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$4.94 Million | CA$57.16 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$19.11 Million | CA$62.22 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$10.01 Million | CA$63.31 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$4.10 Million | CA$45.95 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$20.28 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$9.81 Million | CA$21.83 Million | ▲ +213.4% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$25.24 Million | ▲ +147.0% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$1.39 Million | CA$24.02 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 2014 | 0.44x | CA$7.70 Million | CA$17.53 Million | ▲ +5535.1% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CA$-137.00K | CA$16.95 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | CA$1.64 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | CA$1.91 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$2.27 Million | CA$15.33 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$3.80 Million | CA$15.64 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$2.73 Million | CA$14.82 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | CA$854.76K | CA$8.73 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$161.14K | CA$9.82 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CA$968.46K | CA$9.87 Million | ▲ +1737.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | CA$49.03K | CA$9.18 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | CA$4.80 Million | CA$10.65 Million | ▲ +191.8% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | CA$1.56 Million | CA$10.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2001 | -0.98x | CA$-12.55 Million | CA$12.86 Million | ▼ -141.9% |
| 2000 | -0.40x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$12.39 Million | ▼ -4577.4% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-100.08K | CA$11.61 Million | ▲ +98.1% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | CA$-5.09 Million | CA$11.48 Million | ▼ -283.7% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | CA$2.80 Million | CA$11.61 Million | — |