TECSYS Inc. (TCS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TECSYS Inc. (TCS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$65.54 Million) in one year. See TCS free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TECSYS Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TECSYS Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore how fast is TECSYS Inc. growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TECSYS Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TECSYS Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TECSYS Inc. (TCS) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$13.91 Million | CA$69.15 Million | ▲ +147.2% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | CA$4.86 Million | CA$59.68 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | CA$7.76 Million | CA$56.48 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | CA$4.94 Million | CA$57.16 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$19.11 Million | CA$62.22 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | CA$10.01 Million | CA$63.31 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$4.10 Million | CA$45.95 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$3.69 Million | CA$20.28 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | CA$9.81 Million | CA$21.83 Million | ▲ +213.4% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | CA$3.62 Million | CA$25.24 Million | ▲ +147.0% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$1.39 Million | CA$24.02 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 2014 | 0.44x | CA$7.70 Million | CA$17.53 Million | ▲ +5535.1% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | CA$-137.00K | CA$16.95 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | CA$1.64 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | CA$1.91 Million | CA$14.29 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$2.27 Million | CA$15.33 Million | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$3.80 Million | CA$15.64 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | CA$2.73 Million | CA$14.82 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | CA$854.76K | CA$8.73 Million | ▲ +496.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | CA$161.14K | CA$9.82 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CA$968.46K | CA$9.87 Million | ▲ +1737.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | CA$49.03K | CA$9.18 Million | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | CA$4.80 Million | CA$10.65 Million | ▲ +191.8% |
| 2002 | 0.15x | CA$1.56 Million | CA$10.13 Million | ▲ +115.8% |
| 2001 | -0.98x | CA$-12.55 Million | CA$12.86 Million | ▼ -141.9% |
| 2000 | -0.40x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$12.39 Million | ▼ -4577.4% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | CA$-100.08K | CA$11.61 Million | ▲ +98.1% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | CA$-5.09 Million | CA$11.48 Million | ▼ -283.7% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | CA$2.80 Million | CA$11.61 Million | — |