Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.42x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-16.67 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$11.76 Million) in one year. Explore TLG long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Troilus Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Troilus Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore TLG asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Troilus Gold Corp (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Troilus Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Troilus Gold Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.04x | CA$-33.60 Million | CA$32.16 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2024 | -2.12x | CA$-19.79 Million | CA$9.34 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2023 | -4.48x | CA$-31.11 Million | CA$6.94 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2022 | -3.32x | CA$-42.43 Million | CA$12.79 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2021 | -2.59x | CA$-49.85 Million | CA$19.21 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2020 | -1.88x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$7.64 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2019 | -3.62x | CA$-20.71 Million | CA$5.72 Million | ▼ -238.7% |
| 2018 | -1.07x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$10.53 Million | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2017 | -13.73x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$819.59K | ▼ -7407.5% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-177.75K | CA$971.84K | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | CA$-204.50K | CA$573.90K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-286.54K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2013 | -1.07x | CA$-687.67K | CA$639.80K | ▼ -388.2% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | CA$-107.58K | CA$488.63K | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2011 | -3.90x | CA$-894.37K | CA$229.29K | ▼ -103.7% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | CA$-826.57K | CA$431.73K | ▼ -795.4% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | CA$-227.54K | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +81.7% |
| 2008 | -1.17x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -2089.9% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | CA$-800.99K | CA$14.99 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2006 | -0.89x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -513.5% |
| 2005 | -0.15x | CA$-109.92K | CA$753.83K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-151.42K | CA$57.45K | ▼ -297.3% |
| 2003 | 1.34x | CA$28.96K | CA$21.68K | ▲ +284.8% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-10.75K | CA$14.87K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2001 | -3.52x | CA$-51.24K | CA$14.56K | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2000 | -17.66x | CA$-91.88K | CA$5.20K | — |