Troilus Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Troilus Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.42x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-16.67 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$11.76 Million) in one year. Check TLG capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Troilus Gold Corp (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Troilus Gold Corp from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Troilus Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Troilus Gold Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Troilus Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Troilus Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Troilus Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TLG cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.04x | CA$-33.60 Million | CA$32.16 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2024 | -2.12x | CA$-19.79 Million | CA$9.34 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2023 | -4.48x | CA$-31.11 Million | CA$6.94 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2022 | -3.32x | CA$-42.43 Million | CA$12.79 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2021 | -2.59x | CA$-49.85 Million | CA$19.21 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2020 | -1.88x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$7.64 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2019 | -3.62x | CA$-20.71 Million | CA$5.72 Million | ▼ -238.7% |
| 2018 | -1.07x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$10.53 Million | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2017 | -13.73x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$819.59K | ▼ -7407.5% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-177.75K | CA$971.84K | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | CA$-204.50K | CA$573.90K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-286.54K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2013 | -1.07x | CA$-687.67K | CA$639.80K | ▼ -388.2% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | CA$-107.58K | CA$488.63K | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2011 | -3.90x | CA$-894.37K | CA$229.29K | ▼ -103.7% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | CA$-826.57K | CA$431.73K | ▼ -795.4% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | CA$-227.54K | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +81.7% |
| 2008 | -1.17x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -2089.9% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | CA$-800.99K | CA$14.99 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2006 | -0.89x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -513.5% |
| 2005 | -0.15x | CA$-109.92K | CA$753.83K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-151.42K | CA$57.45K | ▼ -297.3% |
| 2003 | 1.34x | CA$28.96K | CA$21.68K | ▲ +284.8% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-10.75K | CA$14.87K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2001 | -3.52x | CA$-51.24K | CA$14.56K | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2000 | -17.66x | CA$-91.88K | CA$5.20K | — |