Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.42x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-16.67 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$11.76 Million) in one year. See Troilus Gold Corp free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Troilus Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Troilus Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore Troilus Gold Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Troilus Gold Corp (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Troilus Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Troilus Gold Corp (TLG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.04x | CA$-33.60 Million | CA$32.16 Million | ▲ +50.7% |
| 2024 | -2.12x | CA$-19.79 Million | CA$9.34 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2023 | -4.48x | CA$-31.11 Million | CA$6.94 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2022 | -3.32x | CA$-42.43 Million | CA$12.79 Million | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2021 | -2.59x | CA$-49.85 Million | CA$19.21 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2020 | -1.88x | CA$-14.40 Million | CA$7.64 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2019 | -3.62x | CA$-20.71 Million | CA$5.72 Million | ▼ -238.7% |
| 2018 | -1.07x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$10.53 Million | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2017 | -13.73x | CA$-11.25 Million | CA$819.59K | ▼ -7407.5% |
| 2016 | -0.18x | CA$-177.75K | CA$971.84K | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | CA$-204.50K | CA$573.90K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-286.54K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2013 | -1.07x | CA$-687.67K | CA$639.80K | ▼ -388.2% |
| 2012 | -0.22x | CA$-107.58K | CA$488.63K | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2011 | -3.90x | CA$-894.37K | CA$229.29K | ▼ -103.7% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | CA$-826.57K | CA$431.73K | ▼ -795.4% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | CA$-227.54K | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +81.7% |
| 2008 | -1.17x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -2089.9% |
| 2007 | -0.05x | CA$-800.99K | CA$14.99 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2006 | -0.89x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -513.5% |
| 2005 | -0.15x | CA$-109.92K | CA$753.83K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-151.42K | CA$57.45K | ▼ -297.3% |
| 2003 | 1.34x | CA$28.96K | CA$21.68K | ▲ +284.8% |
| 2002 | -0.72x | CA$-10.75K | CA$14.87K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2001 | -3.52x | CA$-51.24K | CA$14.56K | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2000 | -17.66x | CA$-91.88K | CA$5.20K | — |