TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$8.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$45.94 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is TRX Gold Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TRX Gold Corporation across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of TRX Gold Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TRX Gold Corporation (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TRX Gold Corporation. Check TRX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | CA$16.28 Million | CA$59.98 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$15.32 Million | CA$43.96 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2023 | 0.75x | CA$17.33 Million | CA$23.14 Million | ▲ +424.1% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$2.96 Million | CA$20.69 Million | ▲ +119.2% |
| 2021 | -0.74x | CA$-7.52 Million | CA$10.09 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | CA$-6.55 Million | CA$13.25 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$13.81 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$14.56 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$11.96 Million | ▼ -118.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$11.25 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | CA$-680.46K | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2014 | -2.70x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -283.9% |
| 2013 | -0.70x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$5.57 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-4.75 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$5.55 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2010 | -1.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2009 | -4.01x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$624.67K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2008 | -4.50x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$550.54K | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2007 | -3.65x | CA$-2.35 Million | CA$642.71K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2006 | -2.90x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$647.44K | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2005 | -5.07x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$322.00K | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$605.05K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | CA$-944.54K | CA$838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | CA$-454.90K | CA$364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | CA$-197.39K | CA$345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | CA$-423.50K | CA$203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-804.66K | CA$53.31K | — |