TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TRX Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$8.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$45.94 Million) in one year. Check TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TRX Gold Corporation (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TRX Gold Corporation from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TRX Gold Corporation across 28 annual periods. Check TRX Gold Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
TRX Gold Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
TRX Gold Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TRX Gold Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TRX cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | CA$16.28 Million | CA$59.98 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2024 | 0.35x | CA$15.32 Million | CA$43.96 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2023 | 0.75x | CA$17.33 Million | CA$23.14 Million | ▲ +424.1% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | CA$2.96 Million | CA$20.69 Million | ▲ +119.2% |
| 2021 | -0.74x | CA$-7.52 Million | CA$10.09 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2020 | -0.49x | CA$-6.55 Million | CA$13.25 Million | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | CA$-3.60 Million | CA$13.81 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2018 | -0.12x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$14.56 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-3.39 Million | CA$11.96 Million | ▼ -118.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$11.25 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | CA$-680.46K | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2014 | -2.70x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -283.9% |
| 2013 | -0.70x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$5.57 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-4.75 Million | CA$12.59 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2011 | -0.58x | CA$-3.21 Million | CA$5.55 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2010 | -1.02x | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2009 | -4.01x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$624.67K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2008 | -4.50x | CA$-2.48 Million | CA$550.54K | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2007 | -3.65x | CA$-2.35 Million | CA$642.71K | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2006 | -2.90x | CA$-1.88 Million | CA$647.44K | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2005 | -5.07x | CA$-1.63 Million | CA$322.00K | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$605.05K | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2003 | -1.85x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$799.37K | ▼ -64.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13x | CA$-944.54K | CA$838.39K | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2001 | -1.25x | CA$-454.90K | CA$364.50K | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2000 | -0.57x | CA$-197.39K | CA$345.41K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1999 | -2.08x | CA$-423.50K | CA$203.18K | ▲ +86.2% |
| 1998 | -15.09x | CA$-804.66K | CA$53.31K | — |