Talisker Resources Ltd (TSK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Talisker Resources Ltd (TSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$54.58 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Talisker Resources Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Talisker Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Talisker Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Talisker Resources Ltd generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Talisker Resources Ltd (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Talisker Resources Ltd. Check earnings quality score of Talisker Resources Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.36x | CA$-15.87 Million | CA$44.06 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2023 | -0.32x | CA$-8.40 Million | CA$26.43 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2022 | -1.16x | CA$-28.39 Million | CA$24.52 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2021 | -1.00x | CA$-38.14 Million | CA$38.05 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2020 | -0.77x | CA$-17.74 Million | CA$22.90 Million | ▼ -467.1% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | CA$-2.39 Million | CA$17.51 Million | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2018 | -4.76x | CA$-3.01 Million | CA$631.63K | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2017 | -3.06x | CA$-4.41 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2016 | -5.69x | CA$-6.13 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -2138.1% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$860.82K | CA$3.08 Million | ▲ +568.0% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$86.58K | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | CA$896.62K | CA$2.35 Million | ▲ +468.0% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$206.59K | CA$3.08 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2011 | -0.35x | CA$-991.64K | CA$2.82 Million | ▼ -328.9% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | CA$-270.57K | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-653.38K | CA$2.28 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2007 | -0.75x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$2.36 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2006 | -0.44x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$2.36 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2005 | -2.47x | CA$-417.02K | CA$169.11K | ▼ -693.8% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | CA$177.40K | CA$427.16K | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | CA$132.94K | CA$459.34K | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | CA$163.47K | CA$401.39K | ▲ +1195.9% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | CA$-9.64K | CA$259.32K | ▼ -115.6% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CA$68.07K | CA$285.80K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | CA$63.12K | CA$196.42K | ▲ +1507.9% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | CA$4.08K | CA$203.94K | ▲ +104.1% |
| 1997 | -0.49x | CA$-93.18K | CA$190.57K | ▼ -581.7% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | CA$39.58K | CA$389.96K | — |