Talisker Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Talisker Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Talisker Resources Ltd (TSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$54.58 Million) in one year. Check TSK operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Talisker Resources Ltd (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Talisker Resources Ltd from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Talisker Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Talisker Resources Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Talisker Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Talisker Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Talisker Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Talisker Resources Ltd cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.36x | CA$-15.87 Million | CA$44.06 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2023 | -0.32x | CA$-8.40 Million | CA$26.43 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2022 | -1.16x | CA$-28.39 Million | CA$24.52 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2021 | -1.00x | CA$-38.14 Million | CA$38.05 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2020 | -0.77x | CA$-17.74 Million | CA$22.90 Million | ▼ -467.1% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | CA$-2.39 Million | CA$17.51 Million | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2018 | -4.76x | CA$-3.01 Million | CA$631.63K | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2017 | -3.06x | CA$-4.41 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2016 | -5.69x | CA$-6.13 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -2138.1% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$860.82K | CA$3.08 Million | ▲ +568.0% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$86.58K | CA$2.07 Million | ▼ -89.0% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | CA$896.62K | CA$2.35 Million | ▲ +468.0% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$206.59K | CA$3.08 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2011 | -0.35x | CA$-991.64K | CA$2.82 Million | ▼ -328.9% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | CA$-270.57K | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-653.38K | CA$2.28 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2007 | -0.75x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$2.36 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2006 | -0.44x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$2.36 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2005 | -2.47x | CA$-417.02K | CA$169.11K | ▼ -693.8% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | CA$177.40K | CA$427.16K | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | CA$132.94K | CA$459.34K | ▼ -28.9% |
| 2002 | 0.41x | CA$163.47K | CA$401.39K | ▲ +1195.9% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | CA$-9.64K | CA$259.32K | ▼ -115.6% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | CA$68.07K | CA$285.80K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | CA$63.12K | CA$196.42K | ▲ +1507.9% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | CA$4.08K | CA$203.94K | ▲ +104.1% |
| 1997 | -0.49x | CA$-93.18K | CA$190.57K | ▼ -581.7% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | CA$39.58K | CA$389.96K | — |