Talisker Resources Ltd (TSK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Talisker Resources Ltd (TSK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$8.43 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Talisker Resources Ltd net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Talisker Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Talisker Resources Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 28 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$8.43 Million with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. Also explore TSK net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Talisker Resources Ltd (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Talisker Resources Ltd from 1996 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Talisker Resources Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$1.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$45.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$11.44 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$37.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$20.12 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$44.64 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$22.69 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$60.74 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$37.53 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$60.43 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$20.31 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$37.82 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$4.17 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.80 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2017 | 98.9% | CA$13.10 Million | CA$149.82K | CA$14.54 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2016 | 98.2% | CA$18.56 Million | CA$327.21K | CA$19.64 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2015 | 92.6% | CA$6.81 Million | CA$504.60K | CA$9.90 Million | ▲ +46.5 pp |
| 2014 | 46.1% | CA$4.80 Million | CA$2.59 Million | CA$6.88 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2013 | 38.4% | CA$4.88 Million | CA$3.00 Million | CA$7.23 Million | ▲ +14.4 pp |
| 2012 | 24.0% | CA$5.17 Million | CA$3.93 Million | CA$8.25 Million | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2011 | 26.5% | CA$6.13 Million | CA$4.50 Million | CA$8.95 Million | ▲ +8.0 pp |
| 2010 | 18.5% | CA$6.63 Million | CA$5.40 Million | CA$9.93 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2009 | 5.3% | CA$5.59 Million | CA$5.29 Million | CA$7.88 Million | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2007 | 18.0% | CA$8.13 Million | CA$6.67 Million | CA$10.49 Million | ▲ +14.8 pp |
| 2006 | 3.2% | CA$8.29 Million | CA$8.03 Million | CA$10.65 Million | ▼ -96.8 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$4.86 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.03 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$501.49K | CA$0.00 | CA$928.65K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$442.01K | CA$0.00 | CA$901.35K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$387.89K | CA$0.00 | CA$789.28K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$276.09K | CA$0.00 | CA$535.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$225.28K | CA$0.00 | CA$511.08K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$249.21K | CA$0.00 | CA$445.63K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$266.50K | CA$0.00 | CA$470.44K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | CA$232.27K | CA$0.00 | CA$422.84K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | CA$20.87K | CA$0.00 | CA$410.83K | — |