Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$226.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.64 Billion) in one year. See TVE free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd across 23 annual periods. Also explore Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (2002–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.45x | CA$833.21 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$631.63 Million | CA$2.03 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | CA$805.38 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$297.89 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | CA$125.29 Million | CA$518.08 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$205.23 Million | CA$473.34 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$236.67 Million | CA$451.48 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | CA$144.53 Million | CA$433.95 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2016 | 0.31x | CA$60.74 Million | CA$193.83 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | CA$61.39 Million | CA$177.88 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | CA$67.04 Million | CA$193.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$32.72 Million | CA$121.68 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$13.91 Million | CA$67.91 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2011 | 0.75x | CA$9.75 Million | CA$13.00 Million | ▲ +1639.3% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-389.27K | CA$7.99 Million | ▼ -317.0% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | CA$179.95K | CA$8.02 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$2.89 Million | CA$9.62 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$6.21 Million | CA$12.16 Million | ▲ +179.0% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | CA$3.18 Million | CA$17.35 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$2.19 Million | CA$10.79 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2004 | -0.15x | CA$-800.62K | CA$5.44 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-211.73K | CA$2.78 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-47.94K | CA$1.43 Million | — |