Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$226.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.64 Billion) in one year. Check Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (2002–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd from 2002 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd across 23 annual periods. Check Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2024)
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.45x | CA$833.21 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$631.63 Million | CA$2.03 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | CA$805.38 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$297.89 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | CA$125.29 Million | CA$518.08 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$205.23 Million | CA$473.34 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$236.67 Million | CA$451.48 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | CA$144.53 Million | CA$433.95 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2016 | 0.31x | CA$60.74 Million | CA$193.83 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | CA$61.39 Million | CA$177.88 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | CA$67.04 Million | CA$193.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$32.72 Million | CA$121.68 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$13.91 Million | CA$67.91 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2011 | 0.75x | CA$9.75 Million | CA$13.00 Million | ▲ +1639.3% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-389.27K | CA$7.99 Million | ▼ -317.0% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | CA$179.95K | CA$8.02 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$2.89 Million | CA$9.62 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$6.21 Million | CA$12.16 Million | ▲ +179.0% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | CA$3.18 Million | CA$17.35 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$2.19 Million | CA$10.79 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2004 | -0.15x | CA$-800.62K | CA$5.44 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-211.73K | CA$2.78 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-47.94K | CA$1.43 Million | — |