Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (TVE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$226.19 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.64 Billion) in one year. See financial agility of Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd across 23 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd (2002–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. Check Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.45x | CA$833.21 Million | CA$1.87 Billion | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2023 | 0.31x | CA$631.63 Million | CA$2.03 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | CA$805.38 Million | CA$2.46 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$297.89 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | CA$125.29 Million | CA$518.08 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2019 | 0.43x | CA$205.23 Million | CA$473.34 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | CA$236.67 Million | CA$451.48 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | CA$144.53 Million | CA$433.95 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2016 | 0.31x | CA$60.74 Million | CA$193.83 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | CA$61.39 Million | CA$177.88 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0.35x | CA$67.04 Million | CA$193.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | CA$32.72 Million | CA$121.68 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$13.91 Million | CA$67.91 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2011 | 0.75x | CA$9.75 Million | CA$13.00 Million | ▲ +1639.3% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-389.27K | CA$7.99 Million | ▼ -317.0% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | CA$179.95K | CA$8.02 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | CA$2.89 Million | CA$9.62 Million | ▼ -41.2% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | CA$6.21 Million | CA$12.16 Million | ▲ +179.0% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | CA$3.18 Million | CA$17.35 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | CA$2.19 Million | CA$10.79 Million | ▲ +237.6% |
| 2004 | -0.15x | CA$-800.62K | CA$5.44 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-211.73K | CA$2.78 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-47.94K | CA$1.43 Million | — |