Urbana Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Urbana Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Urbana Corporation (URB-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$86.26 Million) in one year. Check Urbana Corporation earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Urbana Corporation (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Urbana Corporation from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Urbana Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Urbana Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Urbana Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Urbana Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Urbana Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Urbana Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-10.90 Million | CA$79.08 Million | ▼ -109.5% |
| 2024 | 1.45x | CA$65.97 Million | CA$45.37 Million | ▲ +1921.2% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$76.07 Million | ▼ -325.6% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$2.04 Million | CA$57.52 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$6.78 Million | CA$46.96 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$39.17 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2019 | -0.90x | CA$-33.54 Million | CA$37.18 Million | ▼ -136.5% |
| 2018 | 2.47x | CA$22.20 Million | CA$8.97 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2017 | 1.65x | CA$25.57 Million | CA$15.54 Million | ▲ +1634.6% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$23.46 Million | ▼ -111.8% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | CA$8.89 Million | CA$9.75 Million | ▲ +454.2% |
| 2014 | -0.26x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$7.41 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | CA$-7.21 Million | CA$17.89 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | CA$4.56 Million | CA$14.54 Million | ▲ +2351.5% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CA$-201.51K | CA$14.46 Million | ▼ -111.6% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$1.71 Million | CA$14.28 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2009 | 2.07x | CA$2.41 Million | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +35342.4% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-70.15K | CA$11.92 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | CA$-297.45K | CA$13.75 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | CA$-528.15K | CA$5.06 Million | ▼ -311.4% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | CA$-55.98K | CA$2.21 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-107.55K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -110.9% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | CA$996.21K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +372.3% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-262.62K | CA$1.01 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2001 | 8.44x | CA$209.80K | CA$24.86K | ▲ +187.9% |
| 2000 | -9.60x | CA$-61.98K | CA$6.46K | ▼ -109.0% |
| 1999 | -4.59x | CA$-100.00K | CA$21.77K | — |