Urbana Corporation (URB-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Urbana Corporation (URB-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$86.26 Million) in one year. See URB-A FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Urbana Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Urbana Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore Urbana Corporation (URB-A) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Urbana Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Urbana Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Urbana Corporation (URB-A) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-10.90 Million | CA$79.08 Million | ▼ -109.5% |
| 2024 | 1.45x | CA$65.97 Million | CA$45.37 Million | ▲ +1921.2% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$76.07 Million | ▼ -325.6% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$2.04 Million | CA$57.52 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$6.78 Million | CA$46.96 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$39.17 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2019 | -0.90x | CA$-33.54 Million | CA$37.18 Million | ▼ -136.5% |
| 2018 | 2.47x | CA$22.20 Million | CA$8.97 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2017 | 1.65x | CA$25.57 Million | CA$15.54 Million | ▲ +1634.6% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$23.46 Million | ▼ -111.8% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | CA$8.89 Million | CA$9.75 Million | ▲ +454.2% |
| 2014 | -0.26x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$7.41 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | CA$-7.21 Million | CA$17.89 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | CA$4.56 Million | CA$14.54 Million | ▲ +2351.5% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CA$-201.51K | CA$14.46 Million | ▼ -111.6% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$1.71 Million | CA$14.28 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2009 | 2.07x | CA$2.41 Million | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +35342.4% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-70.15K | CA$11.92 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | CA$-297.45K | CA$13.75 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | CA$-528.15K | CA$5.06 Million | ▼ -311.4% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | CA$-55.98K | CA$2.21 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-107.55K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -110.9% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | CA$996.21K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +372.3% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-262.62K | CA$1.01 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2001 | 8.44x | CA$209.80K | CA$24.86K | ▲ +187.9% |
| 2000 | -9.60x | CA$-61.98K | CA$6.46K | ▼ -109.0% |
| 1999 | -4.59x | CA$-100.00K | CA$21.77K | — |