Urbana Corporation (URB-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Urbana Corporation (URB-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.47 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$86.26 Million) in one year. See URB-A financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Urbana Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Urbana Corporation across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Urbana Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Urbana Corporation (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Urbana Corporation. Check Urbana Corporation (URB-A) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-10.90 Million | CA$79.08 Million | ▼ -109.5% |
| 2024 | 1.45x | CA$65.97 Million | CA$45.37 Million | ▲ +1921.2% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | CA$-6.07 Million | CA$76.07 Million | ▼ -325.6% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | CA$2.04 Million | CA$57.52 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | CA$6.78 Million | CA$46.96 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2020 | 0.42x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$39.17 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 2019 | -0.90x | CA$-33.54 Million | CA$37.18 Million | ▼ -136.5% |
| 2018 | 2.47x | CA$22.20 Million | CA$8.97 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2017 | 1.65x | CA$25.57 Million | CA$15.54 Million | ▲ +1634.6% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-2.52 Million | CA$23.46 Million | ▼ -111.8% |
| 2015 | 0.91x | CA$8.89 Million | CA$9.75 Million | ▲ +454.2% |
| 2014 | -0.26x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$7.41 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | CA$-7.21 Million | CA$17.89 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | CA$4.56 Million | CA$14.54 Million | ▲ +2351.5% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | CA$-201.51K | CA$14.46 Million | ▼ -111.6% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$1.71 Million | CA$14.28 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2009 | 2.07x | CA$2.41 Million | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +35342.4% |
| 2008 | -0.01x | CA$-70.15K | CA$11.92 Million | ▲ +72.8% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | CA$-297.45K | CA$13.75 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2006 | -0.10x | CA$-528.15K | CA$5.06 Million | ▼ -311.4% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | CA$-55.98K | CA$2.21 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | CA$-107.55K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -110.9% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | CA$996.21K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +372.3% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-262.62K | CA$1.01 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 2001 | 8.44x | CA$209.80K | CA$24.86K | ▲ +187.9% |
| 2000 | -9.60x | CA$-61.98K | CA$6.46K | ▼ -109.0% |
| 1999 | -4.59x | CA$-100.00K | CA$21.77K | — |