Winpak Ltd. (WPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winpak Ltd. (WPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$7.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$208.79 Million) in one year. See Winpak Ltd. leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winpak Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winpak Ltd. across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Winpak Ltd. generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winpak Ltd. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winpak Ltd.. Check how high is Winpak Ltd.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | CA$189.61 Million | CA$239.81 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$181.92 Million | CA$363.21 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | CA$220.84 Million | CA$187.82 Million | ▲ +239.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | CA$77.57 Million | CA$223.71 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | CA$97.06 Million | CA$205.96 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 0.94x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$165.57 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$160.03 Million | CA$146.63 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2018 | 0.92x | CA$130.02 Million | CA$141.03 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2017 | 1.04x | CA$138.37 Million | CA$132.53 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2016 | 0.86x | CA$126.01 Million | CA$146.94 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 1.09x | CA$156.02 Million | CA$142.75 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | CA$97.44 Million | CA$132.94 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | CA$87.71 Million | CA$120.59 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$83.91 Million | CA$118.48 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | CA$95.36 Million | CA$114.00 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.74x | CA$76.03 Million | CA$102.83 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2009 | 0.90x | CA$83.89 Million | CA$93.39 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | CA$47.27 Million | CA$93.19 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$35.87 Million | CA$107.94 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$48.53 Million | CA$101.11 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | CA$31.44 Million | CA$112.90 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$52.55 Million | CA$134.62 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$35.11 Million | CA$110.03 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | CA$48.74 Million | CA$110.15 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$36.59 Million | CA$114.52 Million | ▲ +127.2% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | CA$15.42 Million | CA$109.60 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$18.46 Million | CA$97.81 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$20.67 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | CA$21.34 Million | CA$74.57 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | CA$22.91 Million | CA$54.29 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | CA$18.34 Million | CA$56.62 Million | — |