Winpak Ltd. (WPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winpak Ltd. (WPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$202.29 Million) in one year. Check WPK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winpak Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winpak Ltd. across 31 annual periods. Also explore Winpak Ltd. asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winpak Ltd. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winpak Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Winpak Ltd. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | CA$189.61 Million | CA$239.81 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$181.92 Million | CA$363.21 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | CA$220.84 Million | CA$187.82 Million | ▲ +239.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | CA$77.57 Million | CA$223.71 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | CA$97.06 Million | CA$205.96 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 0.94x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$165.57 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$160.03 Million | CA$146.63 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2018 | 0.92x | CA$130.02 Million | CA$141.03 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2017 | 1.04x | CA$138.37 Million | CA$132.53 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2016 | 0.86x | CA$126.01 Million | CA$146.94 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 1.09x | CA$156.02 Million | CA$142.75 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | CA$97.44 Million | CA$132.94 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | CA$87.71 Million | CA$120.59 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$83.91 Million | CA$118.48 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | CA$95.36 Million | CA$114.00 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.74x | CA$76.03 Million | CA$102.83 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2009 | 0.90x | CA$83.89 Million | CA$93.39 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | CA$47.27 Million | CA$93.19 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$35.87 Million | CA$107.94 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$48.53 Million | CA$101.11 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | CA$31.44 Million | CA$112.90 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$52.55 Million | CA$134.62 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$35.11 Million | CA$110.03 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | CA$48.74 Million | CA$110.15 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$36.59 Million | CA$114.52 Million | ▲ +127.2% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | CA$15.42 Million | CA$109.60 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$18.46 Million | CA$97.81 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$20.67 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | CA$21.34 Million | CA$74.57 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | CA$22.91 Million | CA$54.29 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | CA$18.34 Million | CA$56.62 Million | — |