Winpak Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winpak Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Winpak Ltd. (WPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$7.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$208.79 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Winpak Ltd. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Winpak Ltd. (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Winpak Ltd. from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Winpak Ltd. across 31 annual periods. Check WPK cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Winpak Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Winpak Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winpak Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WPK cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | CA$189.61 Million | CA$239.81 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$181.92 Million | CA$363.21 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | CA$220.84 Million | CA$187.82 Million | ▲ +239.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | CA$77.57 Million | CA$223.71 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | CA$97.06 Million | CA$205.96 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 0.94x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$165.57 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$160.03 Million | CA$146.63 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2018 | 0.92x | CA$130.02 Million | CA$141.03 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2017 | 1.04x | CA$138.37 Million | CA$132.53 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2016 | 0.86x | CA$126.01 Million | CA$146.94 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 1.09x | CA$156.02 Million | CA$142.75 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | CA$97.44 Million | CA$132.94 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | CA$87.71 Million | CA$120.59 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$83.91 Million | CA$118.48 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | CA$95.36 Million | CA$114.00 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.74x | CA$76.03 Million | CA$102.83 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2009 | 0.90x | CA$83.89 Million | CA$93.39 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | CA$47.27 Million | CA$93.19 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$35.87 Million | CA$107.94 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$48.53 Million | CA$101.11 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | CA$31.44 Million | CA$112.90 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$52.55 Million | CA$134.62 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$35.11 Million | CA$110.03 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | CA$48.74 Million | CA$110.15 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$36.59 Million | CA$114.52 Million | ▲ +127.2% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | CA$15.42 Million | CA$109.60 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$18.46 Million | CA$97.81 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$20.67 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | CA$21.34 Million | CA$74.57 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | CA$22.91 Million | CA$54.29 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | CA$18.34 Million | CA$56.62 Million | — |