Winpak Ltd. (WPK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Winpak Ltd. (WPK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.28 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$202.29 Million) in one year. See Winpak Ltd. (WPK) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Winpak Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Winpak Ltd. across 31 annual periods. Also explore WPK net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Winpak Ltd. (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Winpak Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Winpak Ltd. (WPK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | CA$189.61 Million | CA$239.81 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | CA$181.92 Million | CA$363.21 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | CA$220.84 Million | CA$187.82 Million | ▲ +239.1% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | CA$77.57 Million | CA$223.71 Million | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2021 | 0.47x | CA$97.06 Million | CA$205.96 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2020 | 0.94x | CA$156.00 Million | CA$165.57 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2019 | 1.09x | CA$160.03 Million | CA$146.63 Million | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2018 | 0.92x | CA$130.02 Million | CA$141.03 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2017 | 1.04x | CA$138.37 Million | CA$132.53 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2016 | 0.86x | CA$126.01 Million | CA$146.94 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2015 | 1.09x | CA$156.02 Million | CA$142.75 Million | ▲ +49.1% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | CA$97.44 Million | CA$132.94 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2013 | 0.73x | CA$87.71 Million | CA$120.59 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.71x | CA$83.91 Million | CA$118.48 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | CA$95.36 Million | CA$114.00 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.74x | CA$76.03 Million | CA$102.83 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2009 | 0.90x | CA$83.89 Million | CA$93.39 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | CA$47.27 Million | CA$93.19 Million | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$35.87 Million | CA$107.94 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2006 | 0.48x | CA$48.53 Million | CA$101.11 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2005 | 0.28x | CA$31.44 Million | CA$112.90 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$52.55 Million | CA$134.62 Million | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | CA$35.11 Million | CA$110.03 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 0.44x | CA$48.74 Million | CA$110.15 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | CA$36.59 Million | CA$114.52 Million | ▲ +127.2% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | CA$15.42 Million | CA$109.60 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$18.46 Million | CA$97.81 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | CA$20.67 Million | CA$77.33 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | CA$21.34 Million | CA$74.57 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | CA$22.91 Million | CA$54.29 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 1995 | 0.32x | CA$18.34 Million | CA$56.62 Million | — |